2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological inference under unfavorable conditions: Straight and split-ticket voting in diverse settings and small samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since ecological inference is essentially a problem of aggregation, comparing the performance of ecological inference methods across different types of contexts is highly important (Park et al 2014 ). In this regard, the pooled dataset of the four aforementioned elections exhibits conspicuous variation (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since ecological inference is essentially a problem of aggregation, comparing the performance of ecological inference methods across different types of contexts is highly important (Park et al 2014 ). In this regard, the pooled dataset of the four aforementioned elections exhibits conspicuous variation (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant source of variation is the within-district variance which refers to the fact that parties support varies considerably not only across districts but also across subunits within each district. We use a similar criterion as Park et al ( 2014 ) and calculate the across-unit mean and variance of party support within each district with the expectation that a larger variance sets unfavourable conditions for the performance of ecological inference estimators.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of cast vote records in academic research is not new, but the few existing studies using cast vote records have not attempted to describe or explain the patterns of vote choice in state and local (as opposed to statewide or congressional) contests. Past contributions to measurement are exemplified for instance by Park, Hanmer, and Biggers (2014), who use the records as a ground truth for ecological inference estimates in federal offices. Election researchers use it to study specific elections such as ranked choice voting (Alvarez, Hall, and Levin 2018).…”
Section: Potential Explanations For Why Voters Split Their Ticketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…С полной математической нотацией пробит-спецификации метода Томсена можно ознакомиться в первоисточнике(Park, 2008). Модифицированная пробит-спецификация подтвердила высокую точность в оценке раздельного голосования, в том числе превосходя оценки, получаемые в ходе опросных исследований(Park et al, 2014).…”
unclassified