2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Footprint: Informative and evolving – A response to van den Bergh and Grazi (2014)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some academics have argued that the Ecological Footprint is nothing more than an attention grabbing tool (Moffatt, 2000), and does not provide decision-makers with a useful tool for decision-making due to a limited understanding of how different consumer activities relate to impact (see Ayres, 2000;Ferng, 2002;van den Burgh & Verbruggen, 1999). A response to these criticisms has been published by Goldfinger, Wackernagel, Iha, Lazarus, and Lin (2014) ;Lin, Wackernagel, Galli, and Kelly (2015) and Galli (2015).…”
Section: The Ecological Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some academics have argued that the Ecological Footprint is nothing more than an attention grabbing tool (Moffatt, 2000), and does not provide decision-makers with a useful tool for decision-making due to a limited understanding of how different consumer activities relate to impact (see Ayres, 2000;Ferng, 2002;van den Burgh & Verbruggen, 1999). A response to these criticisms has been published by Goldfinger, Wackernagel, Iha, Lazarus, and Lin (2014) ;Lin, Wackernagel, Galli, and Kelly (2015) and Galli (2015).…”
Section: The Ecological Footprintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a newly developed methodology, the policy relevance of ecological footprint theory remains the subject of debate2232333544. One of the potential impacts of our method is to inform the range and location of biocapacity for sustainable development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area is the underlying dimension of the environmental footprint method so the more area a process needs to fulfill a service, the more it cost from sustainable point of view. EF index is used to compare human's demands against the biosphere ability to renew (Lin, 2015). One of the EF family's index method is called sustainable process index (SPI) which can effectively be used for assessing of ecological hotspots and finding alternate environment friendly solutions in the life cycle of a process (Maier, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental footprint is used for evaluation of human's demand according finite amount of biologically productive space (Lin, 2015). The concept of environmental footprint (EF) is based on the evaluation of physical area which is needed to sustain a certain process, whether it is an economic, industrial or farming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%