2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01376-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological compensation of grain trade within urban, rural areas and provinces in China: a prospect of a carbon transfer mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Nanjing's future development is likely to fall between the GDS and GRS, with peak carbon emissions expected to be between 2.78 and 2.95 million tons by 2025. Other prediction studies support this trend, such as Yang et al [34], who predicted that Nanjing could achieve peak carbon emissions of about 200 million tons by 2025, and Yue et al [35], who predicted that Nanjing could reach peak carbon emissions by 2030.…”
Section: Analysis Of Total Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, Nanjing's future development is likely to fall between the GDS and GRS, with peak carbon emissions expected to be between 2.78 and 2.95 million tons by 2025. Other prediction studies support this trend, such as Yang et al [34], who predicted that Nanjing could achieve peak carbon emissions of about 200 million tons by 2025, and Yue et al [35], who predicted that Nanjing could reach peak carbon emissions by 2030.…”
Section: Analysis Of Total Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…19 However, on sustainable and low-carbon development concepts, norms and methodologies, a consensus has not yet been reached. Moreover, there are still significant gaps to be filled in the long-term mechanism of inter-regional sustainable and low-carbon development, 20 and the scope of the pilot project is narrow. 21 Particularly, the study of inter-regional horizontal sustainable and low-carbon development within urban agglomerations is particularly limited in terms of both practical viability and theoretical investigation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If carbon surplus regions more actively reduce their carbon emissions, then carbon deficit regions can enjoy free spillover positive ecological externalities. However, carbon surplus regions would pay the cost of protecting carbon sinks or giving up development opportunities [9,10]. It is the game dilemma of carbon surplus and carbon deficit regions regarding carbon emission reduction and ecological conservation compensation that makes interregional ecological conservation deviate from the optimal state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%