Ecohealth research in Southeast Asia: past, present and the way forward

Abstract

Ecohealth is a comprehensive approach to understanding health at its human, animal and environmental interface in a socio-ecological systems context. This approach was introduced widely in Southeast Asia (SEA) by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in the late 2000s. Aimed at addressing the problem of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), numerous such projects and activities have been generated throughout the region. Ecohealth is increasingly converging with the One Health approach, as both movements emphasise a holistic understanding to health. We conducted a scoping review by considering all of the Ecohealth programmes, initiatives and projects that have been implemented in SEA since the introduction of the approach, and also gathered information from peer-reviewed literature. The objective of this paper is to review Ecohealth activities within SEA over the last 10 years to address the lessons learned, challenges faced and the way forward for Ecohealth in the region. Activities range from those focusing purely on capacity, projects focusing on research and projects covering both. Achievements to date include, for example, research contributing to the field of infectious diseases in relation to social ecological factors and associated urbanisation and agricultural intensification. Challenges remain at the project design and implementation level, in the available capacity and coordination to develop Ecohealth research teams in the countries, gauging teams’ assimilation of Ecohealth’s underlying tenets and their translation into sustainable disease prevention and control, as well as in the ability to scale up Ecohealth projects. We suggest that the way forward for Ecohealth should be from a regional perspective in terms of research, training and policy translation using Ecohealth in combination with the One Health approach.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2049-9957-4-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evaluating one health: Are we demonstrating effectiveness?

“…Within the 15 articles that conducted an evaluation, in some instances efficacy was assumed or determined subjectively, with the perceptions of stakeholders or the number of partnerships as proxy for effective collaboration (i.e. [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] ). In some cases, metrics were siloed to a single discipline (e.g.…”

Transmission of Opisthorchis viverrini, Schistosoma mekongi and soil-transmitted helminthes on the Mekong Islands, Southern Lao PDR

“…Ecohealth research is an emerging field of research studying human health in close connectivity with the ecosystem [ 32 ]. It is increasingly conducted to strengthen the sustainability of infectious disease control programmes [ 33 – 35 ] and was widely introduced in Southeast Asia (SEA) by the Canadian International Development Research Centre (IDRC) in the late 2000s [ 36 , 37 ]. Ecohealth has been defined as follows: i) “EcoHealth involves research and practice to promote sustainability of individuals, animals and biodiversity by linking complex interaction of ecosystem, socio-cultural and economic factors” and ii) “Ecohealth is a comprehensive approach to understanding health at its human, animal and environmental interface in a socio-ecological systems context”.…”

Nutritional, Energy and Sanitary Aspects of Swine Manure and Carcass Co-digestion

“…Because of the repercussions for sustainability and health safety, an overall and multifaceted "One Health" strategy should be implemented to comply with the needs of environmental, human and animal health. This became feasible in the late 1990s through a formalized alliance between the World Health Organization (WHO), the FAO and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (Nguyen-Viet et al, 2015). Animal manure and animal carcasses can carry pathogens that endanger humans, animals and the environment.…”