Oxford Handbooks Online 2013
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199742929.013.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecocriticism, Posthumanism, and the Biological Idea of Culture

Abstract: This article examines the relation of posthumanism to ecocriticism. It contends that ecocriticism and posthumanism are parallel and potentially overlapping fields concerned with biological change and highlights the need for both discipline to address the idea of culture as defined by the binary of nature and culture. It argues that we must focus our philosophical, disciplinary challenge to the anthropocentric orthodoxies of the humanities and stresses the need for ecocriticism to expand our notion of “the worl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Post‐humanist theory combined with critical animal studies challenges the singular focus around human subjects, blurring boundaries between the human and non‐human, looking beyond human agency and exploring and developing the ‘other’ agency within the relationship (Adams & Donovan, ). Wolfe suggests the challenge of post‐humanism is when ‘the animal’ becomes simply another object of study (Feder, ). Indeed, Feder () supports this by stating:
Post‐humanism may challenge the primacy of humanity, the idea of the Human as the all‐pervasive legacy of Enlightenment essentialism … It also signals a renewed interest in the biological world, ideas of human animality and our kinship with other creatures.
…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Post‐humanist theory combined with critical animal studies challenges the singular focus around human subjects, blurring boundaries between the human and non‐human, looking beyond human agency and exploring and developing the ‘other’ agency within the relationship (Adams & Donovan, ). Wolfe suggests the challenge of post‐humanism is when ‘the animal’ becomes simply another object of study (Feder, ). Indeed, Feder () supports this by stating:
Post‐humanism may challenge the primacy of humanity, the idea of the Human as the all‐pervasive legacy of Enlightenment essentialism … It also signals a renewed interest in the biological world, ideas of human animality and our kinship with other creatures.
…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolfe suggests the challenge of post‐humanism is when ‘the animal’ becomes simply another object of study (Feder, ). Indeed, Feder () supports this by stating:
Post‐humanism may challenge the primacy of humanity, the idea of the Human as the all‐pervasive legacy of Enlightenment essentialism … It also signals a renewed interest in the biological world, ideas of human animality and our kinship with other creatures. (p. 266)
A post‐humanist approach to human–animal relations seeks to explore innovative ways of being part of society, with emphasis being placed on what Wilbert () refers to as the human–animal divide from one of oppositional dualism into networks of intricate dependencies focused around kinship.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Cartesian tradition draws a clear-cut divide between incorporeal subjectivity and the material body. 18 To Helena Feder, the "human of humanism, the free-floating Cartesian mind" is a mere "fantasy" 19 that does not account for the materiality of existence. Yet the Cartesian world view is still deeply embedded in contemporary society, as Baume repeatedly shows by insisting on Frankie's reluctance to identify with her own body.…”
Section: Human Animals?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A humán kultúra decentrálását mutatjaHaraway (2007Haraway ( , 2016 munkássága, melyben új nyelvvel is próbálkozik, többek közt a naturecultures (természetkultúrák), multispecies muddles (többfajú sokaság) és a tentacular thinking (tapogatózó gondolkodás) kifejezések bevezetésével. HelenaFeder (2013) az állati kultúrákat vizsgálva, újradefiniálja a kultúrát mint a társadalmi közvetítésen és tanuláson keresztül megjelenő problémamegoldás közegét, és felvázolja egy "többfajú multikulturalizmus" (multispecies multiculturalism) koncepcióját. A poszthumán performativitás fogalmának felépítésével KarenBarad (2003) átfogalmazza az ágencia koncepcióját, relácionális ontológiájában kiterjesztve azt a nem-humán világra.15 Chakrabarty korábbi, 2009-ben publikált tanulmányát (melyet 2010-ben megjelent magyar fordításában idézek) a The Climate of History in a Planetary Age (2021) című könyvéhez hozzáigazítva újraközli, annak első fejezeteként.16 Az emberiségre való hivatkozás fordulópontot jelent Chakrabarty munkásságában: korábbi kutatásait és publikációit posztokoloniális, szubaltern, kisebbségi jogi elméletek és identitásnarratívák diszkurzusai határozták meg, melyek módszeresen igyekeztek kerülni totalizáló kifejezéseket, mint az ember vagy emberiség.…”
unclassified