2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco-efficiency in greenhouse emissions among manufacturing industries: A range adjusted measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As will be shown below, this summation of all slacks in the objective function departs from the ratio form of ratio 1. However, it is consistent with the idea of maximizing output while minimizing EIs and thus has been adopted in past eco-efficiency studies (see Ramli and Munisamy, 2015 and the related studies they cite). This study employed the RAM additive model (Cooper et al, 1999), presented below.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As will be shown below, this summation of all slacks in the objective function departs from the ratio form of ratio 1. However, it is consistent with the idea of maximizing output while minimizing EIs and thus has been adopted in past eco-efficiency studies (see Ramli and Munisamy, 2015 and the related studies they cite). This study employed the RAM additive model (Cooper et al, 1999), presented below.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This study employed the RAM additive model (Cooper et al, 1999), presented below. RAM and its variants have been used in several eco-efficiency studies of industries other than dairy, see Ramli and Munisamy (2015).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it calculates efficiency by considering economic and environmental outcomes to understand undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation [59,60]. Indeed, we consider eco-innovation by adding further sustainability attributes of innovations that allow bioenergy policies to reduce the environmental burden in the evaluation [61,62]. Further, this study measures the eco-efficiency of bioenergy technology policy based on Smith and Street's [63] notion of dynamic effects (i.e., path dependence), which means that contemporary inputs are, to some extent, invested for future outputs.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEA can easily handle multiple inputs and outputs and does not require assumptions about the specific functional form of the production function [69]. To estimate eco-efficiency, we use two policy input factors, namely technology-push and demand-pull activities [2,53], and two output factors, namely innovation outcomes [25,27,64] and the reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions [61,62]. Moreover, R&D expenditure, the contribution of bioenergy to total energy supply, and the number of patent applications are the respective proxies for technology-push policy [12,23,25,70], demand-pull policy [12,23], and innovation outcomes [27,71,72].…”
Section: Data Measurement and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can be used to evaluate the environmental performance of the system; (iii) Models for assessing efficiency, such as the Range Adjusted Measure (RAM) model. These models explain desirable and undesirable outputs in the production process [25] and positive matrix factorization [26]. In recent years, various studies have used DEA to calculate efficiency using different models with multiple inputs and outputs [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%