Echographische Diagnostik bei orbitalen Mukozelen

Rochels, R.; Geyer, G.; Bleier, R

doi:10.1055/s-2007-1008113

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Neoplasms Of the Orbital Walls And The Paranasal Sinuses1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1987

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Book4

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CT-scan displays the extent of the tumor and its topography more clearly than other procedures ( Figure 14). A benign periorbital mucocele has a characteristic [13,15] A-scan pattern and shows a well outlined, low reflective lesion with a bone defect in the normally echofree sinuses. …”

Section: Neoplasms Of the Orbital Walls And The Paranasal Sinusesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sonography and computed tomography in the diagnosis of orbitocranial malformations and tumors

Lieb

Rochels²,

Kretzschmar³

1987

Neurosurg. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standardized sonography and CT scanning have distinct advantages and disadvantages in the evaluation of patients with orbital diseases. Echography provides an efficient screening examination in patients presenting with signs and symptoms of orbital pathology. It allows the detection, localization, measurement and in almost 80% differentiation of orbital lesions. High resolution CT scanning gives an excellent topographic display of masses in the orbit. In visualization of intracranial causes of orbital processes and demonstration of changes in the posterior third of the orbit, in the orbital bones and the periorbital sinuses it is superior to ultrasonography.

show abstract

Section: Neoplasms Of the Orbital Walls And The Paranasal Sinusesmentioning

confidence: 99%