2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiography for prognostication during the resuscitation of intensive care unit patients with non-shockable rhythm cardiac arrest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
48
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifikacija potpunog odsustva srčanih kontrakcija. Kod pacijenata kod kojih se primenjuje KPR, potpuno odsustvo kontraktilnosti srca je važan pokazatelj koji ukazuje da napori u primeni mera resuscitacije neće biti zadovoljavajući 13,14,15,16 .…”
Section: Rezultatiunclassified
“…Identifikacija potpunog odsustva srčanih kontrakcija. Kod pacijenata kod kojih se primenjuje KPR, potpuno odsustvo kontraktilnosti srca je važan pokazatelj koji ukazuje da napori u primeni mera resuscitacije neće biti zadovoljavajući 13,14,15,16 .…”
Section: Rezultatiunclassified
“…"pseudo-EMD." Pseudo-EMD is defined as the sonographic evidence of intrinsic and coordinated myocardial and valvular movement in the absence of a palpable pulse [11,48,49]. Several authors have noted that this observation of pseudo-EMD is associated with a better prognosis for ROSC as compared to true-EMD, which shows no contractile movement of the heart.…”
Section: Us To Interrogate Cardiac Rhythmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70,73 Cardiac contraction (pseudo-pulseless electrical activity) portends a better prognosis for successful resuscitation. 70,73,74 An echocardiographic differential diagnosis can be quickly generated according to the relative sizes of the cardiac chambers and the presence or absence of a large pericardial effusion. 72 We have condensed the 3 suggested approaches to pulseless electrical activity into 1 algorithm (Figure 2), which is intended for experienced emergency medicine and critical care medicine providers working in a hospital-based setting and has not been prospectively validated.…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%