2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0352-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease

Abstract: NE-MRA revealed a relatively high number of inadequate quality segments. This is in line with recently published comparable studies of the similar SPACE NE-MRA techniques. Further advance of NE-MRA techniques remains desirable for patients with PAOD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only femoral examinations in healthy volunteers were evaluated, which is a limitation of this study. Subtractive 3D FSE-based techniques have been demonstrated to have less stable and accurate performance in patients with arterial pathology in comparison with digital subtraction angiography, 45 CE-MRA, 46 and another NCE-MRA technique-quiescent interval slice selective. 47,48 Future work in patients will assess acceleration based on KSPIC and evaluate whether it can improve the diagnostic performance and/or reduce examination times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only femoral examinations in healthy volunteers were evaluated, which is a limitation of this study. Subtractive 3D FSE-based techniques have been demonstrated to have less stable and accurate performance in patients with arterial pathology in comparison with digital subtraction angiography, 45 CE-MRA, 46 and another NCE-MRA technique-quiescent interval slice selective. 47,48 Future work in patients will assess acceleration based on KSPIC and evaluate whether it can improve the diagnostic performance and/or reduce examination times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, CE‐MRA was used as the reference standard, in line with most published studies in the literature . It may be that digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is a more appropriate “gold standard” to compare with, although clearly there may be practical and ethical issues in performing such a comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eight studies of the lower extremities (four of which were limited to the calf or foot) involving a total of 238 patients using either CEMRA (seven studies) or CTA (one study) as the reference standard exam, cardiac‐gated subtractive noncontrast MRA using a fast spin‐echo based readout provided a median sensitivity of ∼86%, and a median specificity of ∼86% for the detection of ≥50% stenosis (evidence level 1b) . However, three other studies involving a total of 75 patients have reported poor image quality and a high rate of nondiagnostic vessel segments …”
Section: Level Of Evidence For Noncontrast Mramentioning
confidence: 99%