2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-019-01479-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG arrhythmia classification using artificial intelligence and nonlinear and nonstationary decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, ANN was adopted to apply the feature vector using them and classify five different arrhythmia heartbeats downloaded from PhysioNet in the MIT-BIH database. The performance of the CEEMDAN and ANN was better than all existing methods, where the sensitivity (SEN) is 99.7%, specificity (SPE) is 99.9%, ACC is 99.9%, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) is 01.0% [46].…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, ANN was adopted to apply the feature vector using them and classify five different arrhythmia heartbeats downloaded from PhysioNet in the MIT-BIH database. The performance of the CEEMDAN and ANN was better than all existing methods, where the sensitivity (SEN) is 99.7%, specificity (SPE) is 99.9%, ACC is 99.9%, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) is 01.0% [46].…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here, data used for the analysis of ECG signals are from the MIT database [45]. Abdalla et al (2019) presented that approach was developed based on the non-linearity and nonstationary decomposition methods due to the nature of the ECG signal. Complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) was used to obtain intrinsic mode functions (IMFs).…”
Section: Annmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Abdalla [6] used ANN for classifying arrhythmia and are compared with the proposed hybrid spatial temporal feature extraction. The extracted hybrid features are fed to SAE classifier and the results obtained is tabulated in the [16], and LSTM-AE [17] that are used for comparison with the existing methods.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heart beat is composed of P wave, T wave and QRS complex that represent time domain features to process atria and ventricular depolarization and repolarisation [5]. For each of the cardiac condition, the magnitude of ECG arrhythmia is distinct from where the features are extracted and these features are used for classifying types of arrhythmia [6].In this study, 5 different types of ECG arrhythmia beats are classified as these 5 irregular waveforms are severe and would result as an heart attack, so the present research classifies Arrhythmia into Normal Sinus Rhythm (N), Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB or L), Right Bundle Branch Block(RBBB or R),Premature Ventricular Contraction (V), and Atrial Premature Beat (A)Rhythm [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatically generated features (such as deep learning features) can be more informative than the expert features. In particular, there have been noticeable successes in the problem of automatic recognition of cardiac diseases using sparse representation of ECG [17], using deep learning generated features [18], [19], combination of artificial intelligence methods and linear and non-linear decomposition [20], different feature extraction methods with machine learning algorithms [21], different end-to-end ECG deep learning classifiers, e.g. [23], [24], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%