2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2065551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBM-9000: EB mask writer for product mask fabrication of 16nm half-pitch generation and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beam size (1σ b ) was set to 3 nm, assuming the latest EB mask writer (NuFlare Technology EBM-9000). 16) The exposed area was pitch × 1000 nm 2 . Electrons were randomly injected into the target area in accordance with the beam profile expressed by Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam size (1σ b ) was set to 3 nm, assuming the latest EB mask writer (NuFlare Technology EBM-9000). 16) The exposed area was pitch × 1000 nm 2 . Electrons were randomly injected into the target area in accordance with the beam profile expressed by Eq.…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stripe pattern was clearly observed inside an ASML wafer alignment mark. The width of the stripe of ~81-µm at mask level was fully in line with the hardware configuration of the EBM-9000 system that was used to create the mask [5]. The data suggested that the stripe pattern is present everywhere inside the image field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The M1A and M1B sub-layers are complimentary to each other and fully compatible with the original Metal 1 process flow even though M1C is not used. The mask has been manufactured on an EBM-9000 system [5] with a specification of +/-10-nm/max error and +/-6-nm/max error after multi-point alignment with scaling and non-ortho removed. It should be emphasized that the mask is within specification and we make use of the residual mask writing errors in this work.…”
Section: Mask Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the principle obstacles that must be overcome is reaching an economically viable throughput. Electron-beam lithography, for example, can generate sub-10 nm features, over large areas, with good placement and overlay, but because of its relatively low throughput, it is limited commercially to the production of masks for use in photo- and nanoimprint lithography and device development, , and noncommercially to the production of nanostructures for research and defense purposes. The prospects for increasing the throughput of electron-beam systems are severely limited because of the fundamental physics of space-charge effectsthe repulsion between neighboring electrons in a single electron column leads to a loss of resolution or blurring of the beam as the beam current increases. This limits the maximum beam current, and hence the throughput, that can be attained at a given resolution.…”
Section: Other Top-down Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%