“…Supplementary file 1 presents the references of the 112 studies that reported some reliability estimates with the data at hand. Of the 112, seven (Bhar & Kyrios, 2005;Elwood, Riskind, & Olatunji, 2011;Haslam, Williams, Kyrios, McKay, & Taylors, 2005;Nedeljkovic & Kyrios, 2007;Wu, 2008;Wu, Aardema, & O´Connor, 2009;Wu & Cortesi, 2009) could not be included in our RG meta-analysis for various reasons, such as reporting reliability coefficients as a range, dichotomization of PI-WSUR scores, or a combination of PI-WSUR subscales. The remaining 105 studies were included in our RG meta-analysis.…”