In a time when medicine has been fairly criticized as producing too many subspecialists, a positive movement toward multidisciplinary care teams has begun. Oncology programs are no exception. Although many cancer centers have dedicated teams based on the primary cancer, individual members within these teams represent multiple disciplines. For example, at minimum, a head and neck cancer team should include a medical oncologist, radiation oncologist, surgical oncologist, nurse, dietitian, speech language pathologist, and social worker. For patients with advanced cancer, multiple randomized studies have shown that early palliative care improves patient quality of life, and in some instances quantity of life. 1 Therefore, an oncology program is not complete without palliative care.In "Outcomes From a Patient-Centered, Interprofessional, Palliative Consult Team in Oncology" published in this issue, Feldstain et al skillfully demonstrate not only the statistical but also the clinical benefits of interdisciplinary specialist palliative care in reducing symptom burden and detecting distress in patients with high intensity scores. Their team consistently used 2 validated tools at patient encounters: the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC). The ESAS is a questionnaire that asks patients to rate the severity of 9 common symptoms-pain, fatigue, tiredness, nausea, appetite, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and wellbeing-on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10. 2 The CPC is a checklist of the most commonly reported problems, divided into the following domains of functioning: physical, emotional, social/family, spiritual, informational, and practical, although the version used by Feldstain and colleagues also included mobility. 3 Similarly, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Distress Management recommend use of the NCCN Distress Thermometer (on which patients rate their distress from 0-10) and Problem List as brief initial screening tools at all clinical visits. 4 Similar to the CPC, the Problem List includes the following domains: physical problems, practical problems, family problems, emotional problems, and spiritual or religious concerns. A Distress Thermometer score â„4 is considered a positive result, and should prompt further questioning and potentially a referral to the appropriate provider based on the source or sources of distress identified. Screening for distress beyond physical sources improves recognition of the impact that social determinants of health have on cancer care. Although these tools are not new to most palliative care programs, their uptake into standard oncology practice has not been universal. 5 Yet, palliative care also finds itself at a critical juncture in ensuring equitable and accessible delivery. Feldstain et al note that their team has tried to expand beyond the ambulatory oncology setting, using phone calls to improve patient follow-up. However, they also mention that several different palliati...