Sarcomas are rare cancers with a spectrum of clinical needs and outcomes. We investigated care experiences and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in sarcoma patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients with appointments during the first two months of the UK lockdown were invited to complete a survey. Questions included views on care modifications, COVID-19 worry and psychosocial impact, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 items. 350 patients completed the survey; median age 58 (16–92) years. Care modifications included telemedicine (74%) and postponement of appointments (34%), scans (34%) or treatment (10%). Most felt the quality of care was not affected (72%), however, social life (87%) and emotional wellbeing (41%) were affected. Worry about COVID-19 infection was moderately high (mean 5.8/10) and significantly related to higher cancer-related worry; associated with lower emotional functioning irrespective of treatment intent. Curative patients (44%) with low resilient coping scores had significantly higher COVID-19 worry. Patients who did not know their treatment intent (22%) had significantly higher COVID-19 worry and insomnia. In summary, care experiences were generally positive; however, cancer-related worry, low resilient coping and uncertainty about treatment intent were associated with COVID-19 worry. These patients may benefit from additional psychological support during the pandemic and beyond.

CIC ‐rearranged sarcoma is a recently established, ultra‐rare, molecularly defined sarcoma subtype. We aimed to further characterise clinical features of CIC ‐rearranged sarcomas and explore clinical management including systemic treatments and outcomes. Methods A multi‐centre retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed between 2014–2019. Results Eighteen patients were identified. The median age was 27 years (range 13–56), 10 patients were male (56%), 11 patients (61%) had localised disease and 7 patients had advanced (metastatic or unresectable) disease at diagnosis. Of 11 patients with localised disease at diagnosis, median overall survival (OS) was 40.6 months and the 1‐, 2‐ and 5‐year OS estimates were 82%, 64% and 34% respectively. Nine patients (82%) underwent surgery (all had R0 resections), 8 (73%) patients received radiotherapy to the primary site (median dose 57Gy in 28 fractions), and 8 (73%) patients received chemotherapy (predominantly Ewing‐based regimens). Metastases developed in 55% with a median time to recurrence of 10.5 months. In patients with advanced disease at diagnosis, median OS was 12.6 months (95% CI 5.1–20.1), 1‐year OS was 57%. Median progression‐free survival was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.5–7.2). Durable systemic therapy responses occurred infrequently with a median duration of systemic treatment response of 2.1 months. One durable complete response of metastatic disease to VDC/IE chemotherapy was seen. Responses to pazopanib ( n = 1) and pembrolizumab ( n = 1) were not seen. Conclusion In this series, CIC ‐rearranged sarcomas affected young adults and had a high incidence of presenting with, or developing, metastatic disease. The prognosis overall was poor. In advanced disease, durable systemic therapy responses were infrequent.

No abstract

Background Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a rare fibroblastic proliferation that was historically treated with surgery. We report (a) outcomes using low‐dose chemotherapy, methotrexate (MTX), and vinorelbine (VNL) for patients with progressing disease (PD) and (b) whether tumor volume ( V tumor ) and T2 signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more reflective of treatment response compared with maximum tumor dimension ( D max ) defined by RECIST1.1. Methods Patients with biopsy‐proven DF, treated with MTX/VNL from 1997 to 2015 were reviewed. MRI for a subset of patients was independently re‐evaluated for response by RECIST, V tumor , and quantitative T2 hyperintensity. Results Among 48 patients treated for a median 19 months MTX/VNL, only nine (19%) had previous surgery. RECIST‐based overall response rate was complete response (CR) 20 (42%) + partial response (PR) 19 (39%), stable disease (SD) 8 (17%), for a clinical benefit rate of 98%. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 120 months, (95%CI 84‐155 months). Thirty‐six (75%) patients had not progressed at a median 38 months from treatment completion. Most common grade 1/2 toxicities included nausea (n = 12, 25%) and fatigue (n = 9,19%) with no grade 3/4 toxicities. In 22 patients with serial MRIs, there was a decrease in D max mean by 30%, V tumor by 76%, and in 19/22 (86%) a decrease in T2 signal intensity. Conclusion Low‐dose MTX/VNL for a defined duration has high efficacy with sustained benefit and minimal toxicity for treating DF. V tumor and T2 signal might better predict treatment response than RECIST.