1997
DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquakes Cannot Be Predicted

Abstract: Can the time, location, and magnitude of future earthquakes be predicted reliably and accurately? In their Perspective, Geller et al .'s answer is “no.” Citing recent results from the physics of nonlinear systems “chaos theory,” they argue that any small earthquake has some chance of cascading into a large event. According to research cited by the authors, whether or not this happens depends on unmeasurably fine details of conditions in Earth's interior. Earthquakes are therefore inhere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
350
1
11

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
350
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…There is even now an opinion that earthquakes could be inherently unpredictable (5). The argument is that past failures and recent theories suggest fundamental obstacles to prediction.…”
Section: Toward a Prediction Of Earthquakes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is even now an opinion that earthquakes could be inherently unpredictable (5). The argument is that past failures and recent theories suggest fundamental obstacles to prediction.…”
Section: Toward a Prediction Of Earthquakes?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this ''fractal'' framework, there is no characteristic scale, and the power law distribution of earthquake sizes reflects the fact that large earthquakes are nothing but small earthquakes that did not stop. They are thus unpredictable because their nucleation is not different from that of the multitude of small earthquakes, which obviously cannot be all predicted (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing predictability in relation to "understandability" yields an even greater level of insight for further action. For example, earthquakes are reasonably well understood in terms of mechanism and distribution, but they are (thus far) unpredictable (Geller et al, 1997). Reduction of vulnerability thus appropriately focuses on application of probabilistic models for structural design, vulnerability assessment, and post-disaster recovery rather than on evacuation plans or highly site-specific hazard mitigation.…”
Section: Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The socio-economic impacts of earthquakes for relatively small regions which are bordering specific seismic sources could be estimated by DSHA since this method is useful for the particular case. However, it is impossible to predict the exact future earthquakes and earthquake randomness is of high aleatory uncertainties [5]. In order to account these uncertainties, the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%