2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-011-0145-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Stability Analysis of Rock Slopes: a Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same slope has also been studied statically and dynamically by Pal et al (2012) using discontinuum approach. They observed a maximum shear displacement of 5.8À9.0 cm and maximum net horizontal displacement of 67À69 cm in static analysis and concluded the detachment zone as vulnerable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same slope has also been studied statically and dynamically by Pal et al (2012) using discontinuum approach. They observed a maximum shear displacement of 5.8À9.0 cm and maximum net horizontal displacement of 67À69 cm in static analysis and concluded the detachment zone as vulnerable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction angles for wet rock surfaces are generally lower than those for dry rock surfaces. To quantify this reduction in the joint friction angle, an indirect approach is adopted and the residual friction angle in the joints of the slopes were reduced by certain amount as adopted by Bhasin and Kaynia (2004) and Pal et al (2012). This approach has been attempted in one of the studied rock slopes i.e., RS-1.…”
Section: Combined Continuum-interface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhasin and Kayania (2004) performed static and dynamic rock slope stability analysis using a numerical discontinuum modelling technique for a 700 m high rock slope in western Norway. Pal et al (2012) used the distinct element code (UDEC), which incorporates the strength and deformability properties of the joints and intact rock for stability analysis of Surabhi landslide, Derahdun, India. As reported in this work, the joint shear strength parameters were assumed based on the type of rock that exists in the study area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock has been regarded as an earthquake-resistant material conventionally, and the influence of different dynamic effects on its engineering characteristics had rarely been considered before the 1990s. However, the dynamic response of rock has recently attracted much attention, with a particular focus on the seismic response of rock tunnels [1,2], the vibration signs (single force inversion and waveform fitness) of a slope on the verge of instability and the subsequently seismic characteristics that are produced by the collapse process [3,4], and the seismic impacts on the stability of rock wedges [5,6]. Rock dynamics have become an emerging science [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%