2005
DOI: 10.22495/cocv3i1p2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earnings management and internal mechanisms of corporate governance: Empirical evidence from Chilean firms

Abstract: We analyze the ability of the capital structure and the ownership structure as mechanisms of control of the managers of the firms and to reduce their accounting discretionary power for a sample of Chilean firms. Using earnings management and abnormal accruals as indicators of discretionary behavior, our results show that both debt and ownership concentration reduce the managers' discretionary behavior, so we corroborate the outstanding role both mechanisms play in a country with low protection of investors' ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the effective monitoring of large shareholders and reduced information asymmetry is expected to reduce the opportunistic behaviour of the managers and hence limit the earnings management. This is supported by previous studies, viz and Iturriaga and Hoffmann (2005). On the other hand, as the ownership becomes more concentrated, it may cause divergence of interest between large and small shareholders.…”
Section: Ownership Structures and Earnings Managementsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In other words, the effective monitoring of large shareholders and reduced information asymmetry is expected to reduce the opportunistic behaviour of the managers and hence limit the earnings management. This is supported by previous studies, viz and Iturriaga and Hoffmann (2005). On the other hand, as the ownership becomes more concentrated, it may cause divergence of interest between large and small shareholders.…”
Section: Ownership Structures and Earnings Managementsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, executives increase their prudency to invest in non-value maximizing projects. Further, high-leverage firms show lenders' scrutiny and control, which could mitigate REM practices [16,28]. Equally, Januarsi et al [29] mention that managers might be reluctant to offer discounts, cut discretionary spending, or reduce the production cost, as these efforts will be valuable only in the short term, contrary to the negative effect on future cash flows in the long-term.…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the positive relationship between debt and REM is grounded in the high default risk of the high-leverage companies, suggesting that firms might increase their real manipulation activities (1) to secure debt refinancing [2,10], (2) to prevent penalties arising from contraventions of debt covenants [11,12], and (3) to show stable and less volatile earnings to increase the confidence of future investors [13,14]. On the other hand, there is a negative association between leverage and REM, as lenders and institutional investors impose spending conditions and increase their scrutiny and control in firms, which reduce managers' opportunistic behavior and mitigate REM practices [15,16]. Furthermore, in the presence of low free cash flow caused by the engagement of REM practices, managers prioritize their debt payments and repayment and increase their prudency to invest in non-value maximizing projects, which reduce firms' leverage [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors use the largest shareholder as a proxy of ownership concentration (e.g., Davidson et al, 2005;Ding, Zhang, & Zhang, 2007). Others also consider the percentage of total shares held by the top 20 shareholders (Bugshan, 2005); the five largest shareholders (López Iturriaga & Saona Hoffman, 2005); or ownership from the second to the tenth shareholder (Liu & Lu, 2007). Since the results on the effect of ownership concentration on earnings management are heterogeneous, it is fruitful to test whether there are differential effects across different measures of ownership concentration.…”
Section: H4: the Measure Of Insider Ownership (Managerial Versus Boarmentioning
confidence: 99%