2006
DOI: 10.1086/499803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early‐Time Observations of the GRB 050319 Optical Transient

Abstract: We present the unfiltered ROTSE-III light curve of the optical transient associated with GRB 050319 beginning 4 s after the cessation of γ-ray activity. We fit a power-law function to the data using the revised trigger time given by Chincarini et al. (2005), and a smoothly broken power-law to the data using the original trigger disseminated through the GCN notices. Including the RAPTOR data 13 Los Alamos National Laboratory, NIS-2 MS D436, Los Alamos, NM 87545, vestrand@lanl.gov, jwren@nis.lanl.gov from Woźnia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the optical emission showed a temporal variability correlated with the gamma-ray emission, suggesting a common origin for the two components. The prompt afterglows of GRB 050319 (Quimby et al 2006;Woźniak et al 2005) and GRB 050401 (Rykoff et al 2005) showed a decay matching the late-time one, without the need for extra components. Last, GRB 050801 ) showed a period of plateaux up to a few minutes after the burst, excluding contribution from the internal shocks, but possibly arguing for energisation from the central engine correlated with the X-ray emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In this case, the optical emission showed a temporal variability correlated with the gamma-ray emission, suggesting a common origin for the two components. The prompt afterglows of GRB 050319 (Quimby et al 2006;Woźniak et al 2005) and GRB 050401 (Rykoff et al 2005) showed a decay matching the late-time one, without the need for extra components. Last, GRB 050801 ) showed a period of plateaux up to a few minutes after the burst, excluding contribution from the internal shocks, but possibly arguing for energisation from the central engine correlated with the X-ray emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…When observed, the ratio of the correlated γ-ray to optical flux densities has been found to be roughly 10 5 to one. In contrast to bursts with γ-ray correlated emission, the common burst is now revealed to either exhibit a single power-law decay from early times (Rykoff et al 2005b, Quimby et al 2006a), or to exhibit a flat or rising (Rykoff et al 2004a or rebrightening (Stanek et al 2007) optical light curve before it enters the standard power-law afterglow decay. The initial brightness of the typical counterpart is V ∼ 14 to 17 mag 3 (Roming et al 2009), which has made observations challenging for smaller (<1 m) robotic facilities, and has limited the extent of the lightcurves collected by the UVOT.…”
Section: Optical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such an event had already been observed in at least two other cases: GRB 060218A (z = 0.03) 1000 s after the GRB [66], and GRB 060729 (z = 0.54) 450 s after the GRB [67,68]. Note that the Figure 3: Observations of GRB 050824 from the MASTER telescope and the MDM Observatory (R) [56].…”
Section: The Short Burst Grb 051103 -A Soft Gamma-ray Repeater In Thementioning
confidence: 89%
“…5). Comparison of the light curve of GRB 060926 obtained using the MASTER telescope [63] (points) with the (a) OPTIMA Burst [64] (circles) and (b) SWIFT XRT (0.3.10 keV; diamonds) [65] light curves.…”
Section: Optical Emission Of Grbs In the First Hour After The Burstmentioning
confidence: 99%