2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Panchromatic study of GRB 060124: from precursor to afterglow

Abstract: We present observations of GRB 060124, the first event for which both the prompt and the afterglow emission could be observed simultaneously and in their entirety by the three Swift instruments. Indeed, Swift-BAT triggered on a precursor ∼570 s before the main burst peak, and this allowed Swift to repoint the narrow field instruments to the burst position ∼350 s before the main burst occurred. GRB 060124 also triggered Konus-Wind, which observed the prompt emission in a harder gamma-ray band (up to 2 MeV). Tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
173
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(84 reference statements)
11
173
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For observations with count rates of >150 c s −1 (WT) and >0.6 c s −1 (PC), pile-up corrections were applied by exercising as many inner pixels as needed for the count rate to drop below these limiting values (Vaughan et al 2006;Romano et al 2006). For creating count rate light curves, corrections for losses due to pile-up and dead zones on the CCD (hot pixels and bad columns) were applied by simulating the complete (i.e., unaffected) and partial (i.e., affected) PSFs for each interval, the ratio of which gives the required correction factor (Evans et al 2007).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For observations with count rates of >150 c s −1 (WT) and >0.6 c s −1 (PC), pile-up corrections were applied by exercising as many inner pixels as needed for the count rate to drop below these limiting values (Vaughan et al 2006;Romano et al 2006). For creating count rate light curves, corrections for losses due to pile-up and dead zones on the CCD (hot pixels and bad columns) were applied by simulating the complete (i.e., unaffected) and partial (i.e., affected) PSFs for each interval, the ratio of which gives the required correction factor (Evans et al 2007).…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all observations considered here, the XRT count rate was >100 c s −1 and hence sufficiently high to cause pile-up. Following the recommended procedure, we therefore excised as many inner pixels as needed for the spectrum to remain unchanged after removing more pixels (e.g., Romano et al 2006). This resulted in the exclusion of the inner 2 ′′ for all five XRT observations.…”
Section: Swiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swift started observing GRB 100814A in windowed timing mode and moved to photon counting (PC) mode 450 s after the trigger when the photon count rate was ∼4 cts/s. Before ∼6 ks the PC mode count rate exceeded 0.6 cts/s, therefore a standard pile-up correction procedure was applied (see Moretti et al 2005;Romano et al 2006;Vaughan et al 2006). The extraction used a circular region of a typical width of 25 pixels, as discussed in Evans et al (2009).…”
Section: X-ray Data Reduction and Spectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the observational point of view, long periods of quiescence of the central engine, lasting up to thousands of seconds, have been observed in a fraction of GRBs showing the so called pre-or post-cursors in their prompt gamma-ray emission phase (Ramirez-Ruiz et al 2001;Romano et al 2006;Burlon et al 2008Burlon et al , 2009Gruber et al 2010). If these gamma-ray emission episodes are associated with the acceleration of different shells with respect to the main prompt event, these are supposed to interact with the latter ones, probably leading to an observable optical flux rebrightening if the difference in Γ is large enough.…”
Section: Ultrarelativistic Shell Collisionmentioning
confidence: 99%