2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early relations between language development and the quality of mother–child interaction in very-low-birth-weight children

Abstract: The biological factors may influence on the language development more in the VLBW children than in the full-term children. The results also underline the role of maternal and dyadic factors in early interactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
16
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, forward logistic regression revealed that the total language score improved significantly by 89.4% in the presence of positive parent-child interaction. This comes in agreement with the results reported by Meijssen et al[ 32 ] and Stolt et al[ 33 ], who stated that the quality of mother-child interaction was associated significantly with later language development in high risk children. The importance of parent-child interaction was not only in its existence or not, but by the quality of such interaction which should positively affect language development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, forward logistic regression revealed that the total language score improved significantly by 89.4% in the presence of positive parent-child interaction. This comes in agreement with the results reported by Meijssen et al[ 32 ] and Stolt et al[ 33 ], who stated that the quality of mother-child interaction was associated significantly with later language development in high risk children. The importance of parent-child interaction was not only in its existence or not, but by the quality of such interaction which should positively affect language development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Research also suggests that maternal sensitivity influence the cognitive and socio‐emotional development of infants born preterm. For example, lower maternal sensitivity is associated with poorer cognitive development of infants born preterm at the age of 9 months (Beckwith, Cohen, Kopp, Parmelee, & Marcy, ), and poorer social regulatory behaviors (Clark et al., ; Goldberg, Lojkasek, Gartner, & Corter, ) and language skills at toddlerhood (Stolt et al., ) and preschool age (Beckwith & Rodning, ; Magill‐Evans & Harrison, ). Moreover, infants born preterm whose mothers participated in intervention programs targeting maternal sensitivity showed improved cerebral white matter microstructural development (Milgrom et al., ) as well as a large increase in communication and social skills at the age of 2 years (Newnham et al., ).…”
Section: The Quality Of Spontaneous Movements Of the Infantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies involving premature children and the development of the language have already been conducted considering the corrected age of the children (13,(26)(27)(28) . Thus, we may question whether the delay in language development among premature children could correspond to this difference between the gestational age in which the child was born and the complete gestational time of 40 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%