2016
DOI: 10.3906/vet-1602-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early pregnancy diagnosis using a commercial ELISA test based on pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in Holstein-Friesian heifers and lactating cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between Days 26 and 58 after AI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the inhouse PAGs ELISA tests varied between 94% and 100%, 77% and 94.2%, 90.7% and 97.8%, and 91.2% and 97.1%, respectively (Table 4). Mercadante et al [81] found higher PAGs concentrations (in-house ELISA) in primiparous cows compared with multiparous pregnant cows (in agreement with Ricci et al [36], while Kaya et al [82] found similar differences between heifers and lactating cows), during the second and later breeding compared with the first breeding postpartum, in cows experiencing clinical metritis, metabolic problems and left displaced abomasum after calving compared with cows not experiencing those clinical diseases and in cases of greater milk yield, while the body condition score did not influence it. According to Dufour et al [38], the accuracy of the PAG test (commercial milk ELISA) was not influenced by parity, the number of days, since the last breeding, and the level of milk production, while Ricci et al [37] found a negative correlation between plasma and milk PAG concentration (commercial ELISA) and milk production.…”
Section: In-house Pags Elisa Testssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Between Days 26 and 58 after AI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the inhouse PAGs ELISA tests varied between 94% and 100%, 77% and 94.2%, 90.7% and 97.8%, and 91.2% and 97.1%, respectively (Table 4). Mercadante et al [81] found higher PAGs concentrations (in-house ELISA) in primiparous cows compared with multiparous pregnant cows (in agreement with Ricci et al [36], while Kaya et al [82] found similar differences between heifers and lactating cows), during the second and later breeding compared with the first breeding postpartum, in cows experiencing clinical metritis, metabolic problems and left displaced abomasum after calving compared with cows not experiencing those clinical diseases and in cases of greater milk yield, while the body condition score did not influence it. According to Dufour et al [38], the accuracy of the PAG test (commercial milk ELISA) was not influenced by parity, the number of days, since the last breeding, and the level of milk production, while Ricci et al [37] found a negative correlation between plasma and milk PAG concentration (commercial ELISA) and milk production.…”
Section: In-house Pags Elisa Testssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…P regnancy maintenance is a clear economic factor in dairy animals since most of the pregnancy losses occur during the early stages of pregnancy (Garcıa-Ispierto et al, 2013;Commun et al, 2016). Therefore, timely pregnancy diagnosis is very important for sound reproductive management in herd health (Green et al, 2005;Kaya et al, 2016). Several techniques are being used to diagnose pregnancy in dairy herd such as ultrasound, palpation per rectum, estrone sulfate, milk progesterone assay, and blood tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also found similar PAGs concentrations in dairy heifers during the 4th week of gestation using the same commercial PAG ELISA test kit. 34 Serum progesterone concentrations of the pregnant heifers in the Ovsynch Group were lower (4.70 ± 0.17 ng/mL) than those found in the control (5.37 ± 0.08 ng/mL), or the PG (5.34 ± 0.13 ng/mL) groups (p < 0.001; Figure 1). There are reports that suggest that GnRH-based protocols are associated with low blood progesterone concentrations.…”
Section: Serum Pags and Progesterone Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…16 Particularly, for pregnancy diagnosis through the PAGs assay, when the S-N value was ≥ 0.300 the samples were deemed as positive (pregnant), and when the S-N value was below 0.300 the samples were considered negative (nonpregnant). 34 Serum progesterone concentrations were determined by a commercial bovine progesterone ELISA test kit (Wuhan Fine Biological Technology Co., Ltd., China), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.…”
Section: Measurement Of Serum Pags and Progesterone Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation