2011
DOI: 10.1626/pps.14.169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Planting and Early Nitrogen Application Increase Stem Total Digestible Nutrient Concentration and Yield of Forage Rice in Southwestern Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009 forage rice was grown for WCS on more than 10,000 ha, half of which was in southwestern Japan where the prosperous livestock industry requires large quantities of forage (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, 2010). Previous studies have examined the effects of cultivation treatments on DM yield (Nakano and Morita, 2007, 2008, 2009; Nakano et al, 2008, 2009b) and TDN yield (Nakano et al, 2009a, 2010, 2011a, 2011b) to develop an appropriate cultivation system that will produce high DM yield and TDN yields from the forage rice used to provide WCS. However, an optimal system for the forage rice used to provide concentrated nutrition has not yet been developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009 forage rice was grown for WCS on more than 10,000 ha, half of which was in southwestern Japan where the prosperous livestock industry requires large quantities of forage (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, 2010). Previous studies have examined the effects of cultivation treatments on DM yield (Nakano and Morita, 2007, 2008, 2009; Nakano et al, 2008, 2009b) and TDN yield (Nakano et al, 2009a, 2010, 2011a, 2011b) to develop an appropriate cultivation system that will produce high DM yield and TDN yields from the forage rice used to provide WCS. However, an optimal system for the forage rice used to provide concentrated nutrition has not yet been developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first treatment of nitrogen application T1(2/3 as basal+1/3 at panicle initiation) produced the highest values of dry matter production at panicle initiation (788.03 and 801.94 g/m²) in 2011 and 2012 seasons, respectively, while, the lowest values of dry matter production at panicle initiation (668.64 and 688.04 g/m²) in the first and second seasons, respectively were obtained by the fifth treatment T5( 1/4 as basal +1/4 at MT +1/4 at BT +1/4 at complete heading ).On the other hand, application of nitrogen into four splits T6(1/4 as basal+1/4 at MT+1/4 at PI+ 1/4 at flowering) gave the maximum values of dry matter production at flowering (1971.54 and 2039.65 g/m²) in the first and second seasons respectively, While the lowest values of dry matter production at flowering (1702.40 and 1775.34 g/m²) in 2011 and 2012 seasons, respectively were produced when two-third of nitrogen as basal and one-third at panicle initiation were applied. These results are mainly attributed to the fact that nitrogen application along with the real-time paralleled with the plant nitrogen demand at various physiological growth stages especially along with first flowering encourage plant photosynthesis during plant growth through increases of all vegetative growth characters which led finally to raising dry matter production at flowering .These results are in a compatibility with Ebaid and El-Mowafi (2005) , Arafat (2007), Sathiya and Ramesh (2009) and Nakano et al (2011).…”
Section: -Growth Characters 1-1-dry Matter Production (G/m²)mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some studies have indicated that hulls of forage rice harvested at yellow‐ripe can restrict cattle’s ( Bos taurus ) ability to digest the grains (Hara et al, 1986; Nakui et al, 1988; Hosoda et al, 2005). Hence, cultivars and cultivation methods for increasing the ratio of leaf plus stem DW to whole plant DW have been developed (Kato, 2008; Nakano et al, 2008, 2010, 2011a, 2011b; Nakano and Morita, 2009; Kato et al, 2010). Similarly, some scientists reported that hulls of forage barley harvested from soft dough to maturity restricted cattle’s ability to digest the grains (Ogawa et al, 1974; Tobino et al, 1976).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%