Early Mother‐Infant Reciprocity

Brazelton, T. Berry; Tronick, Edward Z.; Adamson, Lauren B.; Als, Heidelise; Wise, Sarah

doi:10.1002/9780470720158.ch9

Cited by 161 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sosiale interaksjoner mellom omsorgsgiver og spedbarnet veksler mellom å vaere synkrone og gjensidig regulerende, eller de-synkronisert, og det er bare en liten del av interaksjonen som kan beskrives som gjensidig regulerende samspill (Tronick, 2007). Under synkroniserte samspill deltar spedbarn og omsorgsgiver i protodialog hvor mor og barn regulerer hverandres følelser og atferd i en synkronisert rytme (Brazelton, Tronick, Adamson, Als, & Wise, 1974). De-synkroniserte samspill kan oppleves som ubehagelig for spedbarnet, men anses som utviklingsmessige viktig fordi spedbarnet utvikler raskt strategier som effektivt bidrar til å reparere og re-etablere interaksjonen.…”

Section: Sosiale Interaksjoner Og Biososiale Atferdsskift I Løpet Barunclassified

Pakkeforløpene i psykisk helsevern er feil medisin

Undem¹

2018

Tidsskriftet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Sosiale Interaksjoner Og Biososiale Atferdsskift I Løpet Barunclassified

Pakkeforløpene i psykisk helsevern er feil medisin

Undem¹

2018

Tidsskriftet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…But it is far worse to show a baby a blank face -to make no response at all to its eager facial displays. In one of the most replicated results in developmental psychology, Brazelton et al 10 described a phenomenon in which an infant, after three minutes of 'interaction' with a non-responsive expressionless mother, and after repeated attempts to get a response fail, 'finally withdraws into an attitude of helplessness, face averted, body curled up and motionless'.…”

Section: When Interpretation Breaks Downmentioning

confidence: 99%

Morality and Interpretation: Commentary on Jonathan Glover's Alien Landscapes?

Kennett

2016

J Applied Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is required of the interpreter of disordered minds and what can we learn from the process? Jonathan Glover's book focuses on human interpretation and its role in psychiatry. His hope is that a more careful and sensitive exploration of minds that are very different from our own, will assist us to answer a range of important questions about human agency, identity and responsibility. In this commentary I will focus on the process and purpose of interpretation and expand on some of the moral issues that arise out of the interpretive challenges posed by mental disorders.What is required of the interpreter of disordered minds and what can we learn from the process? Jonathan Glover's book focuses on human interpretation and its role in psychiatry. His hope is that a more careful and sensitive exploration of minds that are very different from our own, will assist us to answer a range of important questions about human agency, identity and responsibility. Glover's exploration ranges across a variety of very different disorders including personality disorders, eating disorders, addiction, schizophrenia and autism. His work highlights the moral as well as the intellectual importance of the challenge of understanding minds that are, or at least seem, very different from our own. In this commentary I will focus on the process and purpose of interpretation and expand on some of the moral issues that arise out of the interpretive challenges posed by mental disorders. I will suggest that some of the difficulties that Glover describes are closely connected to those features of what I will call the interpretive project that are directed at locating ourselves in the social world and I will argue that his book demonstrates that interpreting disordered minds demands moral commitment and wisdom. Interpretation and Folk Psychology -Why it is So Important to UsThe interpretive project is a project we all have in navigating our social world. The capacity to predict other's behaviour is an important one for social creatures such as ourselves. We need to know what people are likely to do and we also need to know what people are like. Predicting and making sense of people's actions in terms of their goals draws on a default assumption of rationality -that people will act to serve their goals, e.g. 'she is hurrying because she is late to pick up the children from school'. Our attribution of desires and goals and our behavioural predictions are importantly modified in the light of what we believe the person is like. We ascribe to each other, not just

show abstract

“…Also, synchronicity, reciprocity play an important part in this process, when the mother is ready to completely "get lost" in a child during the period of his/her activity. The studies by T. Brazelton and his colleagues, carried out in 1975, showed that the inadequate response by a mother leads to confusion and disruption of the child's emotional security (Brazelton & et al, 1975).…”

Section: Internal Representations That Depend Onmentioning

confidence: 99%