A Companion to Experimental Philosophy 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118661666.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Modern Experimental Philosophy

Abstract: In the mid-seventeenth century a movement of self-styled experimental philosophers emerged in Britain. Originating in the discipline of natural philosophy amongst Fellows of the Royal Society of London, it soon spread to medicine and by the eighteenth century had impacted moral philosophy, political philosophy, and aesthetics. Early modern experimental philosophers gave epistemic priority to observation and experiment over theorising and speculation. They decried the use of hypotheses and systembuilding withou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift has increased the significance of knowledge. Advocating the empirical methods further by well-known rationalists like Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz (Anstey, 2010), it, in turn, has given rise to the thought that only knowledge can bring one up to the truth, and has led to glorifying and idolizing the science. In contrast, Cartesian approach of relating the individual to the consciousness (I think, therefore I am), Kant's attempts to push the religious concerns out of the borders of knowledge, and Hegel's absolute concept did not work towards a solution.…”
Section: релігієзнавствоmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shift has increased the significance of knowledge. Advocating the empirical methods further by well-known rationalists like Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz (Anstey, 2010), it, in turn, has given rise to the thought that only knowledge can bring one up to the truth, and has led to glorifying and idolizing the science. In contrast, Cartesian approach of relating the individual to the consciousness (I think, therefore I am), Kant's attempts to push the religious concerns out of the borders of knowledge, and Hegel's absolute concept did not work towards a solution.…”
Section: релігієзнавствоmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. Kashaf [11], F.M. Akhmedova, A.A. Kornilov [12], R. Anstey [13], Iu.V. Verminenko., N.V. Ershov [14], D. B. Mamayusupova, M. R. Gofurov [15], E.Sharipova,Zh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. See also Anstey and Vanzo 2016. For criticisms to Anstey's interpretation see the editors' introduction in Biener and Schliesser 2014, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%