2019
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Infectious Disease Consultation Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Complete the 3-Hour Sepsis Treatment Bundle

Abstract: Objective Severe sepsis and septic shock (SS/SS) treatment bundles reduce mortality, and early infectious diseases (ID) consultation also improves patient outcomes. We retrospectively examined whether early ID consultation further improves outcomes in Emergency Department (ED) patients with SS/SS who complete the sepsis bundle. Method We included 248 adult ED patients with SS/SS who completed the 3-hour bundle. Patients with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our hospital values the infectious diseases specialty and promotes its influence, as demonstrated by the high penetrance of IDC. In the face of resource limitation, prioritization of IDC in select situations that have demonstrated a benefit of IDC involvement, such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (13,14,16), resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections (17), Pseudomonas bacteremia and candidemia (16), septic shock (18) and high-level antimicrobial prescription (19), may be a suitable approach for some hospitals. Although infectious disease expertise in the form of remote AS prospective audit and feedback (PAF) alone has clear benefits (1-4), our study suggests that IDC improves the use of antimicrobials overall due to expertise brought to the bedside.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our hospital values the infectious diseases specialty and promotes its influence, as demonstrated by the high penetrance of IDC. In the face of resource limitation, prioritization of IDC in select situations that have demonstrated a benefit of IDC involvement, such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (13,14,16), resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections (17), Pseudomonas bacteremia and candidemia (16), septic shock (18) and high-level antimicrobial prescription (19), may be a suitable approach for some hospitals. Although infectious disease expertise in the form of remote AS prospective audit and feedback (PAF) alone has clear benefits (1-4), our study suggests that IDC improves the use of antimicrobials overall due to expertise brought to the bedside.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the lack of definitive and generalizable data regarding the optimal duration of therapy for patients who are critically ill, it is not surprising that there is considerably practice variation [281,294]. Specialist consultation appears to be associated with improved patient outcomes for a variety of infectious syndromes [295][296][297][298][299][300]. This has generally been ascribed to improvements in microbial appropriateness of the empiric antimicrobial regimen provided.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fidaxomicin use was often times accompanied by an infectious diseases consultation, a known predictor of positive outcomes for several infection types. [21][22][23][24] However, receipt of an infectious diseases consult did not confound the association between treatment and the composite outcome in the multivariate analyses. Given the real-world nature of the study, patients who received concomitant CDI antimicrobials were included in the study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%