2011
DOI: 10.1080/19404158.2011.586711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early identification of young struggling readers: Preliminary benchmarks for intervention for students in years one and two in schools in New South Wales

Abstract: It is now widely acknowledged that early intervention programs should be provided for young students who are experiencing difficulty in learning to read. It is important, therefore, to have efficient ways of identifying students who are most in need of intervention. The aim of this study was to establish preliminary performance benchmarks to identify the bottom 25% of year 1 and year 2 students in NSW schools at two key points in the school year. Students from grades 1 and 2 (n ¼ 335) at two schools nominated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No "at-risk" children were excluded from the intervention. The 40 th percentile has been widely used as a threshold for reading 'at grade level' statewide in the Unites States, including RtI initiatives and in tools such as DIBELS (Jimerson et al, 2016;Mellard & Johnson, 2008), and worldwide (e.g., in Australia; Reynolds, Wheldall, & Madelaine, 2011). Children attending schools in the Simplicity GPC condition received the Simplicity GPC intervention and children attending schools in the Control condition received the Letter Name intervention (see below).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No "at-risk" children were excluded from the intervention. The 40 th percentile has been widely used as a threshold for reading 'at grade level' statewide in the Unites States, including RtI initiatives and in tools such as DIBELS (Jimerson et al, 2016;Mellard & Johnson, 2008), and worldwide (e.g., in Australia; Reynolds, Wheldall, & Madelaine, 2011). Children attending schools in the Simplicity GPC condition received the Simplicity GPC intervention and children attending schools in the Control condition received the Letter Name intervention (see below).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%