1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(89)80054-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early femoral component loosening in DF-80 total hip arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of our study contrast reports with cases of early loosening and high loosening rates after cemented implantation of titanium alloy straight femoral prostheses [10,13,18,21]. A mechanism of crevice corrosion has been described as a mechanism of loosening in cemented titanium stems [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of our study contrast reports with cases of early loosening and high loosening rates after cemented implantation of titanium alloy straight femoral prostheses [10,13,18,21]. A mechanism of crevice corrosion has been described as a mechanism of loosening in cemented titanium stems [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…This stem exhibited gross endosteal lysis, with over two thirds demonstrating some degree of lysis at 5.2 years [36]. The DF-80 monoblock ti-alloy stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) had a high rate of revision for aseptic stem loosening, with rates of 4.3% and 3% reported at short follow-up [16,28]. The ITH modular stem (Smith & Nephew Richards, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) had rapid and progressive aseptic stem loosening, with 7.7% revision rate at 5 years [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For series of cemented titanium stems, numerous authors have reported loosening rates of 10-49% at 3-5 years (Robinson et al 1989, Tompkins et al 1994, Rorabeck et al 1996a). We found cemented fixation to be inferior when titanium stems were used and superior when a stainless steel or cobalt-chrome stem was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included study design (randomized vs. non-randomized), study site (registry vs. single institution), component followed (cup versus stem), and patient age range (≤ 55 versus > 55 years of age). We also tested the hypothesis that certain groups of implants that have performed poorly in observational studies could influence summary estimates, such as titanium stems and screw-fit or macro-ingrowth cups (Robinson et al 1989, Tompkins et al 1994, Rorabeck et al 1996b, Kubo et al 2001, Aldinger et al 2004, Fink et al 2004, Grant and Nordsletten 2004. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the contribution of each individual comparison to the summary estimate.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%