2014
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early experience and reproductive morph both affect brain morphology in adult male Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Abstract: It is clear that brain size and structure can be greatly influenced by the environment, and in fish, factors such as habitat complexity, rearing environment, and reproductive status have been shown to affect brain morphology and behaviour, but it is unclear how long these effects last. The objective of the current study was to investigate variability in overall brain size and particular brain regions of male Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) through the evaluation of potential driving forces -environme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Atlantic salmon individuals being reared continuously in the hatchery (the same hatchery as in the present study) had a higher brain:body mass ratio than individuals that were released into the wild half a year earlier (Näslund et al ., ). Hatchery‐reared chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha , originating from wild parents and being released as pre‐smolts, were found to have larger relative brain size than wild conspecifics, even after 3 years at sea (Wiper, Britton & Higgs, ). Investigating male clonal lines of rainbow trout, domesticated lines (>10 generations in hatchery) had larger brains than wild lines (wild parents) (Campbell et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Atlantic salmon individuals being reared continuously in the hatchery (the same hatchery as in the present study) had a higher brain:body mass ratio than individuals that were released into the wild half a year earlier (Näslund et al ., ). Hatchery‐reared chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha , originating from wild parents and being released as pre‐smolts, were found to have larger relative brain size than wild conspecifics, even after 3 years at sea (Wiper, Britton & Higgs, ). Investigating male clonal lines of rainbow trout, domesticated lines (>10 generations in hatchery) had larger brains than wild lines (wild parents) (Campbell et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain size has a strong positive correlation to body size, brain/ body size ratios decrease as body size increases, and brain size has a tendency to show a stronger increase with increasing body size during early ontogeny rather than adulthood [see Striedter, 2005, for a detailed review of these brain-body size relationships]. To control for these allometric effects, we calculated the relative lobe volume for each fish specimen [Bullmore et al, 1995;Burish et al, 2004;Wiper et al, 2014]. For example, when examining the relative lobe volume, body size was controlled for by dividing the lobe volume by the total brain volume to give the relative value (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control for these allometric effects, we calculated the relative lobe volume for each fish specimen [Bullmore et al, 1995;Burish et al, 2004;Wiper et al, 2014]. For example, when examining relative lobe volume, body size was controlled for by dividing lobe volume by total brain volume to give the relative value (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain size and structure have been correlated with spatial complexity within a habitat, dietary requirements and a range of social behaviours in comparative studies on a range of taxa, including primates [Barton, 1996;Reader and Laland, 2002], birds [Healy and Guilford, 1990;Clayton, 2001], ungulates [Shultz and Dunbar, 2006] and more recently fishes [Pollen et al, 2007;Gonzalez-Voyer and Kolm, 2010;Wilson and McLaughlin, 2010;Costa et al, 2011;Kotrschal et al, 2012a, b;Lecchini et al, 2014;Wiper et al, 2014]. These correlations were generated by determining brain volumes using the ellipsoid method and histology, and this study has added a further method for consideration, micro-CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%