2003
DOI: 10.1136/vr.153.2.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early dissemination of foot‐and‐mouth disease virus through sheep marketing in February 2001

Abstract: The results of epidemiological investigations suggest that livestock on up to 79 premises, spread widely throughout the British Isles, may have been exposed to infection by foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus by the movement of infected sheep before the first case of the disease was confirmed at an abattoir in Essex on February 20, 2001. A further 36 premises may have been infected by this route before the national livestock movement ban was imposed on February 23.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is the possibility of environmental contamination, this is a lower estimate for the infectious period. However, direct movement of sheep from single infected herds dispersed at markets was the major source of long-distance spread (Mansley et al 2003). If the market infectious period is scaled with the farm infectious period (figure 2b), the same R 0 gives a similar GSCC size over the four-week time-scale (an ergodic scale, allowing comparison of the static network properties with transmission dynamics), but not when comparing between seasons (a non-ergodic scale, where such a comparison is not valid).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is the possibility of environmental contamination, this is a lower estimate for the infectious period. However, direct movement of sheep from single infected herds dispersed at markets was the major source of long-distance spread (Mansley et al 2003). If the market infectious period is scaled with the farm infectious period (figure 2b), the same R 0 gives a similar GSCC size over the four-week time-scale (an ergodic scale, allowing comparison of the static network properties with transmission dynamics), but not when comparing between seasons (a non-ergodic scale, where such a comparison is not valid).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring and surveillance is based on European legislation (European Parliament and Council, 2001), which, in its turn, is based on the Terrestrial Animal Health Code (OIE, 2014). Interestingly, the foot-andmouth disease epidemic of 2001 in the UK was first identified at an abattoir in Essex, even though the index case occurred on a pig farm in Northumberland (Davies, 2002, Bourn, 2002, Mansley et al, 2003.…”
Section: Notifiable Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite potentially mild or unapparent clinical disease, sheep may play a critical role in the epidemiology of FMD outbreaks. This was particularly evident during the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK when transportation and trade with apparently unaffected sheep caused extensive dissemination of the infection before any measures of disease control were initiated (Gibbens et al, 2001;Mansley et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%