“…Type of sample: of the nine included studies, four studies [4,16,26, 28] had serum-derived samples and three studies [22,24,25] had plasma-derived samples, and the results of meta-analysis showed: In serum group, Combined sensitivity and speci city were 0.87 [ 95% CI (0.80, 0.93)] and 0.74 [ 95% CI ( 0.62, 0.84)];Combined sensitivity and speci city in the plasma group were 0.86 [ 95% CI ( 0.66, 0.97)] and 0.83 [ 95% CI (0.67, 0.93)], respectively; this result suggests that samples of serum origin have higher sensitivity and lower speci city compared to plasma. Whether to combine: of the nine included studies, nine studies [4,16,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28] reported data on miR-21 alone for the diagnosis of breast cancer and three studies [25][26][27] reported data on miR-21 combined with other miRNAs for the diagnosis of breast cancer, and the meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity and speci city of miR-21 alone for breast cancer diagnosis was 0.91 [95% CI (0.86, 0.95)] and 0.85 [95% CI (0.77, 0.91)];the combined sensitivity and speci city of combined diagnosis were 0.97 [95% CI (0.92, 0.99)] and 0.92 [95% CI (0.73, 0.99)];This results suggest that sensitivity and speci city of miR-21 combined with other miRNAs in the diagnosis of breast cancer is superior to that of the diagnosis alone.…”