2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early and Late Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Dialysis Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main causes of death in our series were ventricular tachycardia and ischemic colitis. Tanaka et al [7] have described the mechanism and prevention of these causes. The rapid correction of excess water is thought to be the cause of the collapse of the peripheral circulation that triggers ischemic colitis or abnormal blood levels of electrolytes, which might cause ventricular arrhythmia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main causes of death in our series were ventricular tachycardia and ischemic colitis. Tanaka et al [7] have described the mechanism and prevention of these causes. The rapid correction of excess water is thought to be the cause of the collapse of the peripheral circulation that triggers ischemic colitis or abnormal blood levels of electrolytes, which might cause ventricular arrhythmia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, many of these studies examined outcomes after all types of cardiac surgery. Only a few studies have solely focused on outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) [7]. Single mitral valve replacement (MVR) was reported to have a 23% greater risk of death than AVR [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no significant difference in mid-term survival between bioprosthesis and mechanical valves. Of the 14 included studies, two studies (16,20) demonstrated a survival advantage in favour of mechanical prostheses over bioprosthesis and the remaining 12 studies failed to demonstrate a survival advantage according to prosthesis type. There was a significant reduction in bleeding events comparing bioprosthesis with mechanical valves (5.2% vs. 6.4%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After exclusion of duplicate or irrelevant references, 40 potentially relevant articles were retrieved. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 relevant articles were included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis (7,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). A total of 8,483 patients with ESRD were included for analysis, including 6,187 receiving bioprosthesis and 2,296 receiving mechanical valves.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies on SAVR in dialysis patients have been performed [16,17,18], showing an increased surgical risk in these patients. The largest study of 5,858 dialysis patients undergoing surgical valve replacement found an in-hospital mortality rate of 20.7% [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%