2005
DOI: 10.1258/1357633054471902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-health and the Universitas 21 organization: 1. Global e-health through synergy

Abstract: The Universitas 21 (U21) organization funded a one-year project to examine global e-health. An e-health steering committee surveyed the opinions of e-health researchers at U21 member schools and conducted a literature review. Information about key themes was analysed and the findings were summarized. The steering committee recommended an eight-step strategy to establish a sustainable endeavour in global e-health. This included implementing a dissemination strategy within the U21 organization to engage a progre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That data must in turn be used to effectuate change, which, as the program evaluation literature has shown us, is by no means a guarantee [46,47]. This is one reason why Ho and Sharman [48] stress that researchers not only collaborate with policymakers, health administrators, and health professionals in sharing knowledge, best practices, and innovations, but that individuals with special expertise in this area take advantage of their unique experience and serve as early adopters, coaches, advisers, and enablers. Indeed, it behooves scholars to recognize that the results of their labors can be used both instrumentally, to adjust, modify or improve particular programs or policies, and conceptually, to influence how key stakeholders think about telehealth more generally.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That data must in turn be used to effectuate change, which, as the program evaluation literature has shown us, is by no means a guarantee [46,47]. This is one reason why Ho and Sharman [48] stress that researchers not only collaborate with policymakers, health administrators, and health professionals in sharing knowledge, best practices, and innovations, but that individuals with special expertise in this area take advantage of their unique experience and serve as early adopters, coaches, advisers, and enablers. Indeed, it behooves scholars to recognize that the results of their labors can be used both instrumentally, to adjust, modify or improve particular programs or policies, and conceptually, to influence how key stakeholders think about telehealth more generally.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its greatest weakness, at least in academic terms, is the lack of evidence supporting its clinical and cost advantages relative to traditional services, notwithstanding a number of retrospective reviews demonstrating the value to referrers [ 13 - 15 ]. This represents an important opportunity for research, and the Universitas 21 consortium of universities has recently formed an eHealth partnership with the Swinfen Charitable Trust [ 16 ] with a view to obtaining the follow-up necessary to make assessments of safety and effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The term provides a reminder of a simple but crucial fact -in our networked world, local policy has global impact and global policy has local impact. 15 The aim of the present study -which was part of the Universitas 21 (U21) consortium's work in global e-health 16 -was to summarize the status of global e-health policy.…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%