2012
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2012010105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-Government Utilization

Abstract: The implementation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the public sector has numerous benefits. Government administrators are aggressively seeking ways to enhance the development and implementation of more effective and efficient government services. One electronic government initiative that is growing in importance and popularity is electronic tax filing. This study explores the factors that contribute to e-file utilization. To test the proposed model a survey is administered to 152 taxpaye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On most occasions when the word "reputation" (or the term "perceived reputation") is used, it is not defined and, therefore, it is not possible to state with confidence that the same issues of concern 55 are under consideration. There are some exceptions, for example Carter, Schaupp, Hobbs, and Campbell (2012), but even in this article reputation is only fleetingly discussed and is measured by just three variables (which are not identified). The lack of definitional 60 clarity may derive in part from the fact that reputation is a multidimensional concept and as a result can be difficult to bind precisely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On most occasions when the word "reputation" (or the term "perceived reputation") is used, it is not defined and, therefore, it is not possible to state with confidence that the same issues of concern 55 are under consideration. There are some exceptions, for example Carter, Schaupp, Hobbs, and Campbell (2012), but even in this article reputation is only fleetingly discussed and is measured by just three variables (which are not identified). The lack of definitional 60 clarity may derive in part from the fact that reputation is a multidimensional concept and as a result can be difficult to bind precisely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several scholars have either looked at this directly or considered the reputation of public sector bodies as part of a larger question (e.g. 425 Andreassen, 1994;Carmeli & Cohen, 2001;Carter et al, 2012;Luoma-Aho, 2008;Waeraas et al, 2015;Waeraas & Byrkjeflot, 2012). Andreassen (1994), for example, examines the attitude of the business community to local governments in Norway and shows that reputation is correlated with satisfaction and loyalty in the sense of the willingness of firms to remain in a local authority area.…”
Section: Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EE has a negative impact on BI, indicating that respondents believe navigating My PhilHealth Portal is complicated. However, SI and FCs do not appear to be predictors of BI, implying those notions of prominent studies (Taylor and Todd,1995b;Chiu et al 2010;Lee and Lin 2008;Alraja, 2016;Carter et al, 2012), including the UTAUT model (Venkatesh et. al., 2003), appear to be different in the context of this study.…”
Section: Implications To Theorymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…It has also been found that SI constructs contain the explicit or implicit notion that people behave influenced by the way they believe others will perceive them as a result of using technology (Venkatesh et al, 2003). Previous e-government literature has investigated SI as a significant predictor of BI for use (Carter et al, 2012;Susanto & Aljoza, 2015). This study observes the effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, facilitating conditions, and social influence on the behavioral intention of the public of Semarang in utilizing SIKER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, the relationship between FC and BI in e-government adoption research has been explored in several studies. For example, Carter et al (2012) found that FC has a significant impact on an individual's intention to use the system. Social Influence (SI) is the degree to which an individual perceives that others who are important to them believe they should use the system (Venkatesh et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%