2004
DOI: 10.1108/17415650480000008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E‐Chalk: a lecture recording system using the chalkboard metaphor

Abstract: This article describes a system that produces web based learning modules as a by-product of regular classroom teaching. The lecturer uses a pen sensitive display in place of the traditional chalkboard. In addition to drawings, the electronic chalkboard handles a range of multimedia elements from the Internet. The system records all actions and provides both a live transmission and a replay of the lecture from the web. Remote students follow the lecture looking at the dynamic board content and listening to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Echo360 is also widely distributed across institutions internationally (Echo360, 2015). Other systems of video-recording, though all different in method and purpose, include Camtasia Relay, Abode Captivate and Blackboard Collaborate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Echo360 is also widely distributed across institutions internationally (Echo360, 2015). Other systems of video-recording, though all different in method and purpose, include Camtasia Relay, Abode Captivate and Blackboard Collaborate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, studies that specifically compare one method of delivery over another for benefits and drawbacks are needed. Whilst there are institutional and cross-institutional case studies of the use of lecture-recording systems (Friedland, Knipping, Schulte, & Tapia, 2004;Larkin, 2010;Phillips et al, 2007) as well as discipline-and cohort-specific studies (Johnston, Massa, & Burne, 2013;Leadbeater, Shuttleworth, Couperthwaite, & Nightingale, 2013;SpaethHilbert, Seufert, & Wesner, 2013;Yeung, Raju, & Sharma, 2016a), this paper addresses current knowledge gaps by presenting evidence of disciplinary differences amongst lecturers in their views about the use of lecture-recordings, and expanding on comparisons between student-lecturer experiences following the introduction of Echo360 as an opt-out system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant outcome has been the emergence of systems that easily capture and process lecture recordings, such as: i) the E-Chalk project [16], a system that transforms the lecturer's input on a large touch-sensitive screen into an intelligent electronic chalkboard; ii) the virtPresenter lecture recording framework [17], that automates lecture recording production and presents the content through highly-adaptable Web 2.0 user interfaces (which can also be integrated in social environments); and iii) ETH Zurich's REPLAY [18], that automates the lecture recording with dedicated hardware, and incorporates content indexing. Other approaches use a lecture recording search engine specifically for academic content, or use podcasting as an easy distribution channel for lecture recordings [19], [20].…”
Section: Generating Oer By Recording Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al, 2009;Friedland et al, 2004;Lauer et al, 2004;MacKenzie, 2005;Traphagan, 2005). After the wide acceptance of hybrid learning methods in Harokopio University, it was decided to explore the provision of a lecture video service and its impact in the learning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%