2008
DOI: 10.1080/02757200802320934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E. B. Tylor and the Problem of Primitive Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Taylor said that any culture is not a new creation because 'it is a result of past times' and, yet showing 'in the case of survival clear vestiges of the course of its development' [43]. If time could reverse and remove variants of a culture, the society would be completely different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor said that any culture is not a new creation because 'it is a result of past times' and, yet showing 'in the case of survival clear vestiges of the course of its development' [43]. If time could reverse and remove variants of a culture, the society would be completely different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his Primitive Culture , Tylor argued that the ‘general principles of savage religion’, far from being a ‘rubbish-heap of miscellaneous folly’, were ‘essentially rational’, albeit ‘working in a mental condition of intense and inveterate ignorance’ (Tylor, 1920: 22). Surviving primitive logics, if internally rational, were nonetheless inferior to contemporaneous civilized rationalities, hence revealing the cognitive incompetence of primitive peoples (see Ratnapalan, 2008). Frazer provided a cognate argument to Tylor in his 1908 inaugural lecture at the University of Liverpool.…”
Section: Colonial Development and Southern Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…intelligibility with the evolution of knowledge. Tylor claimed that in spite of their obsolescence, survivals continued to play a role in the beliefs and practices of some contemporary societies and were particularly persistent in non-European cultures (see Keane 2007;Ratnapalan 2008). For Tylor, the term "custom" stood in for culture in the colonies, defined by artifacts, beliefs, and practices from the past, asynchronous with modern temporality.…”
Section: U Lt U R a L I S M A N D T H E N E W E U R O P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He theorized the discrepancy entailed in the acknowledgement of different stages within a pan-human culture concept through his theory of “survivals.” This theory claims that certain practices made sense in the past, but have lost their intelligibility with the evolution of knowledge. Tylor claimed that in spite of their obsolescence, survivals continued to play a role in the beliefs and practices of some contemporary societies and were particularly persistent in non-European cultures (see Keane 2007; Ratnapalan 2008). For Tylor, the term “custom” stood in for culture in the colonies, defined by artifacts, beliefs, and practices from the past , asynchronous with modern temporality.…”
Section: Islam Is Not Culture or The Critique Of “Backward Cultural Tmentioning
confidence: 99%