1961
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-196110000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dysfunctional Labor. Ii. Protracted Active-Phase Dilatation in the Nullipara

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Labor was monitored via partograph [18] and external cardiotocography. After delivery, 1-and 5-minute Apgar scores were evaluated and the newborns were carefully examined by a neonatologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labor was monitored via partograph [18] and external cardiotocography. After delivery, 1-and 5-minute Apgar scores were evaluated and the newborns were carefully examined by a neonatologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contractility does, however, increase, thus conferring risk with no offsetting benefit. [69][70][71] Role of contractile force To diagnose arrest of dilatation, the guidelines require that the cervix be 6 cm dilated, the membranes be ruptured, and there be no progress for 4 hours with adequate contractions, or 6 hours with inadequate contractions produced by oxytocin. They define adequate uterine contractility as "e.g., >200 Montevideo Units" (MVU), but recommend no alternative means of assessment.…”
Section: Analytical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors recognized that pethidine lengthened or inhibited labour (Gallen & Prescott 1944, Campbell et al 1961, Bumhill et al 1962; some claimed that it did not affect, or shortened the length of labour (Gilbert & 1970, Crawford 1974). Wilson & Alesbury (1951) claimed that pethidme could both shorten and lengthen labour and others claimed that the effect of pethidine on labour depended on the time in the first stage at which it was given (Friedman & Sachtleben 1961a).…”
Section: Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%