“…This was further supported in a later study by Tedersoo et al (2015) , highlighting ITS2 in particular as the strongest candidate. Nonetheless, an array of marker targets have been used in human microbiota studies, including both ITS regions ( Ghannoum et al, 2010 ; Charlson et al, 2012 ; Delhaes et al, 2012 ; Findley et al, 2013 ; Bittinger et al, 2014 ; Dupuy et al, 2014 ; Wang X. et al, 2014 ; Willger et al, 2014 ; Hoarau et al, 2016 ; Liguori et al, 2016 ; Strati et al, 2016 ; Botschuijver et al, 2017 ; Gao et al, 2017 ; Hamad et al, 2017 ; Huseyin et al, 2017 ; Motooka et al, 2017 ; Schei et al, 2017 ; Zhao et al, 2017 ) as well as SSU ( Aurora et al, 2013 ; van Woerden et al, 2013 ; Cleland et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2014 ) and LSU ( Zhang et al, 2011 ; Park et al, 2012 ). The use of different methodological approaches makes meaningful comparisons between studies difficult, and it is unclear whether observed differences are genuine (e.g., due to geographical influences affecting the fungal exposure of different populations) or simply biases associated with different methods.…”