1976
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(76)80225-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the reaction H2+(He; H)HeH+. Comparison of beam experiments with quasi-classical trajectory studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences could arise due to several reasons: (i) The experimental results are not fully (v, j, E trans ) resolved. Havemann et al 15 showed that there could be charge transfer between H and HeH + formed through a spectator stripping mechanism, 4,18,42,43 from higher v states resulting in dissociation at large internuclear distances; this implies non-adiabatic transitions; our studies are confined to the ground electronic state. (iii) The present study uses the centrifugal sudden approximation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These differences could arise due to several reasons: (i) The experimental results are not fully (v, j, E trans ) resolved. Havemann et al 15 showed that there could be charge transfer between H and HeH + formed through a spectator stripping mechanism, 4,18,42,43 from higher v states resulting in dissociation at large internuclear distances; this implies non-adiabatic transitions; our studies are confined to the ground electronic state. (iii) The present study uses the centrifugal sudden approximation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The expected vibrational and rotational population distributions for the resultant HeH + have been calculated by Schneider etal., 14 and exhibit significant population differences among lowlying vibration-rotational states. The source is capable of producing an HeH + beam of typically 3 to 8 nA current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…angle e, and product c.m. recoil energy Er are related to the Cartesian flux distribution by63 (3) (4)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%