2015
DOI: 10.15356/2076-6734-2012-2-
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of the Bilchenok Surging Glacier in the Klyuchevskaya Volcano Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S10 shows the distribution in which the sources classified as “earthquakes” (i.e., impulsive individual events) were added. The only notable difference is the appearance of very shallow events northwest of Ushkovsky volcano that might be related to the presence of actively moving glaciers in this region ( 33 ). At the same time, the imaged active plumbing system in the midlower crust remains essentially unchanged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure S10 shows the distribution in which the sources classified as “earthquakes” (i.e., impulsive individual events) were added. The only notable difference is the appearance of very shallow events northwest of Ushkovsky volcano that might be related to the presence of actively moving glaciers in this region ( 33 ). At the same time, the imaged active plumbing system in the midlower crust remains essentially unchanged.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of these investigations, some of the glaciers in the Central Kamchatka Depression have been documented as "surge-type" (Vinogradov et al, 1985). For example, Bilchenok glacier (56.100 • N, 160.482 • E) in the Klyuchevskaya volcanic group is known to have surged ∼ 2 km in 1959/1960 and again in 1982/84 (Muraviev et al, 2012). In this example, surging appears unrelated to climate and is likely driven by the strengthening of seismic activity at Ushkovsky Volcano (56.069 • N, 160.467 • E), upon which the glacier sits (Muraviev et al, 2012 Barr and Solomina, 2014).…”
Section: Glaciersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This might reflect the comparatively short time period considered or may be a reflection of volcanically controlled surging (see Sect. 2.3) (Muraviev et al, 2012), which therefore lacks periodicity.…”
Section: Volcanic Controls and Debris Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Glaciar Amarillo retreated ~ 76 m yr -1 between 1961and 2007, but advanced 243 ± 49 m between November 2007 (coinciding with the period of subglacial geothermal heating), after which, glacier retreat resumed . At Ushkovsky, strengthening of seismic (and perhaps volcanic) activity is thought to have caused Bilchenok Glacier (which emanates from the NW corner of the ice-filled caldera) to advance by 1050m and 700-800 m in 1959-1960 and 1982-84, respectively (Muraviev et al, , 2012. Finally, at Mount Kazbek, periods of increased subglacial volcanic and/or geothermal activity may have caused the acceleration, advance, and destabilisation of local glaciers at various periods during the 20 th and 21 st centuries (Chernomorets et al, 2007).…”
Section: Glacier Advance And/or Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%