The structural and functional properties of the visual system are disrupted in mutant animals lacking the 2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. In particular, eye-specific retinogeniculate projections do not develop normally in these mutants. It is widely thought that the developing retinas of 2 ؊/؊ mutants do not manifest correlated activity, leading to the notion that retinal waves play an instructional role in the formation of eye-specific retinogeniculate projections. By multielectrode array recordings, we show here that the 2 ؊/؊ mutants have robust retinal waves during the formation of eye-specific projections. Unlike in WT animals, however, the mutant retinal waves are propagated by gap junctions rather than cholinergic circuitry. These results indicate that lack of retinal waves cannot account for the abnormalities that have been documented in the retinogeniculate pathway of the 2 ؊/؊ mutants and suggest that other factors must contribute to the deficits in the visual system that have been noted in these animals.lateral geniculate nucleus ͉ multielectrode array ͉ retinal ganglion cells ͉ retinogeniculate segregation ͉ gap junction T he precise connections that characterize the mature nervous system often arise from an early exuberant pattern that becomes refined through a combination of molecular and activity-dependent cues. In the case of the visual system, the projections of the two eyes to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) are initially intermingled before gradually becoming segregated into separate layers in animals with a laminated dLGN such as ferret, cat, and monkey or to different regions of the geniculate as in the mouse and rat (1-3). During the developmental period when eye-specific retinogeniculate projections are being established the retina manifests a remarkable pattern of activity. Immature retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) discharge periodic bursts of action potentials, with adjacent cells firing in a temporally correlated manner, resulting in waves of activity sweeping across the retinal surface (4-7). These retinal waves have been considered to be essential for the formation of eye-specific retinogeniculate projections through a Hebbiantype mechanism where the connections stemming from one eye are strengthened and maintained, whereas those of the other eye become eliminated based on which set of inputs is more capable of activating dLGN neurons (8, 9). Evidence in support of this prevalent notion has been provided by studies that have relied on pharmacological agents to alter the normal activity patterns of the developing retina. Several studies have shown that blocking or perturbing retinal activity prevents the formation of segregated retinogeniculate projections (9-11). These observations have led to the conclusion that retinal waves instruct the formation of eye-specific domains (8,(12)(13)(14).Studies that have used mutant mice have also supported a linkage between retinal waves and development of segregated retinogeniculate projections. In particular, anim...