2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of radiation exposure to marine biota in the area of the Fukushima NPP in March–May 2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In coastal areas, absorbed dose rates of up to 4,600 mGy d −1 for macroalgae and 2,600 mGy d −1 for benthic biota (fish, molluscs, and crustaceans) were estimated from exposure to 131 I, 134 Cs, and 137 Cs (both internal and external) during the first month after the initial FDNPP release, assuming equilibrium with ambient radionuclide activities (Garnier-Laplace et al 2011). However, subsequent studies have shown that these estimates were likely an overestimate, as Cs and 131 I activities declined rapidly (Buesseler et al 2011, Kryshev et al 2012). …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coastal areas, absorbed dose rates of up to 4,600 mGy d −1 for macroalgae and 2,600 mGy d −1 for benthic biota (fish, molluscs, and crustaceans) were estimated from exposure to 131 I, 134 Cs, and 137 Cs (both internal and external) during the first month after the initial FDNPP release, assuming equilibrium with ambient radionuclide activities (Garnier-Laplace et al 2011). However, subsequent studies have shown that these estimates were likely an overestimate, as Cs and 131 I activities declined rapidly (Buesseler et al 2011, Kryshev et al 2012). …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioactivity was significantly released into the environment, and a large marine ecosystem in the Pacific Ocean along the eastern coast of Japan was contaminated by the radioactivity. After the accident, the radiation effect on the marine biota as the result of the accident was investigated in a few studies (Garnier-Laplace et al, 2011;Kryshev et al, 2012;Keum et al, 2013Keum et al, , 2014. The initial studies were mostly based on an equilibrium approach, and there have been relatively few dynamic approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed the refinement of early estimates that had identified the potential for ecological consequences (Garnier-Laplace et al, 2011) but, since equilibrium of the biota with maximum ambient concentrations had been assumed, this led to higher exposures than subsequently calculated (Buesseler et al, 2011;Kryshev et al, 2012;Vives i Batlle, 2011 were not to be expected (UNSCEAR, 2014). The more recent IAEA study provides an evaluation consistent with these findings (IAEA, 2015).…”
Section: State Of Knowledge On the Impact Of The Fdnpp Accident On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other dynamic modelling methodologies have been used to study the transfer of FDNPP radionuclides to marine biota (Heling et al, 2002;Keum et al, 2015;Kryshev et al, 2012;Maderich et al, 2014;Psaltaki et al, 2013 exceeding the Japanese radioactivity in food limit of 100 Bq kg -1 (Buesseler, 2012;Buesseler and Aoyama, 2012;Wada et al, 2013). However, the activity concentrations in marine products in (Wada et al, 2016).…”
Section: State Of Knowledge On the Impact Of The Fdnpp Accident On Thmentioning
confidence: 99%