People who move will all engage in perceived exertion (PE) to some degree. Perceptions of exertion accompany physical activity and play an important role in effort-regulation during physical work. Sensations perceived to be within the "comfort zone" will indicate no need to make any effort adjustments, whereas sensations perceived as too intense will inform a decision to adjust work output.
CONCEPTUAL ISSUESDespite its ubiquity, the concept of PE is difficult to define. Perception of exertion involves a complex array of factors, including afferent feedback from the working organs, muscles, and joints; subjective perceptions of force, resistance, or strain; psychophysiological perceptions of breathlessness and nausea; psychological components such as motivation, determination, and task-aversion, as well as input from the brain' s central motor command system. Feelings of pain and discomfort, although distinct, can also affect the overall PE.Further complicating the proper definition of PE is the fact that the terms exertion and effort are often used interchangeably, although these perceptions are different but related psychological constructs. The distinctions between the two perceptions are explored in depth later in the chapter. As an initial point of clarity, we use the term perceived exertion in the first part of the chapter because of its widespread use in the relevant literature. Later, we speak more specifically to perceived effort, which better reflects the array of related perceptions during exercise, of which exertion is only one (see also Razon, Hutchinson, & Tenenbaum, 2012).
History of Perceived ExertionGunnar Borg was the first to define and measure PE in the 1960s. Borg, a psychophysicist, was interested in how the perception of exertion develops with changes in workload and whether perception ratings might provide an indicator of performance capacity as a supplement to the physiological values (Borg, 1962). To measure these perceptual estimates, Borg introduced a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale (Borg, 1978). The most recent iteration of the RPE scale measures the intensity of PE on a 15-point scale ranging from 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion). The numeric range was designed to parallel the heart rate (HR) range of a normal healthy male (60-200 beats/minute). Borg later developed the CR10 scale (Borg, 1982), which satisfied the psychophysical requirements of ratio scaling. The CR10 scale has a primary numerical range of 0 to 10, with the first verbal anchor at 0.5. The upper anchor of Extremely strong, maximal is at 10, although there is no fixed upper endpoint. This gives the option to select a maximum intensity greater than 10 by