2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9601(02)00246-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of collapsing and exploding Bose–Einstein condensate

Abstract: Recently, Donley et al. performed an experiment on the dynamics of collapsing and exploding Bose-Einstein condensates by suddenly changing the scattering length of atomic interaction to a large negative value on a preformed repulsive condensate of 85 Rb atoms in an axially symmetric trap. Consequently, the condensate collapses and ejects atoms via explosions. We show that the accurate numerical solution of the time-dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation with axial symmetry can explain some aspects of the dynamics… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous collapse experiments with atomic BECs [22][23][24][25][26][27] (see also [28]) were performed in the traditional setting of a harmonic trap. The critical point [23] and collapse times [24,26] were in general agreement with theoretical expectations [10,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], but no evidence of weak collapse was observed; the atom loss was only seen to grow with |a| [25].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Previous collapse experiments with atomic BECs [22][23][24][25][26][27] (see also [28]) were performed in the traditional setting of a harmonic trap. The critical point [23] and collapse times [24,26] were in general agreement with theoretical expectations [10,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], but no evidence of weak collapse was observed; the atom loss was only seen to grow with |a| [25].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Saito and Ueda [10] suggest the bursts are atoms originally near the center of the collapse that acquire kinetic energy when three-body losses suddenly remove a large number of atoms from the center of the collapse. In these simulations and others [12][13][14][15][16][17], the burst atoms are distinguished from the condensate purely by their location. In the simulations of Milstein et al and Wüster et al the burst is assumed to be a distinct noncondensed field which can occupy the same space as the condensate.…”
Section: B Theorymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These and other [14][15][16][17] simulations qualitatively reproduce the collapse process, the delay before atom loss begins, the condensate number decay constant τ decay , bursts, and jets, but have achieved no solid quantitative agreement with observation. Minor differences in these authors' results, as well as the lack of quantitative agreement with experiment, may be due to their different choices of density-dependent loss rates.…”
Section: B Theorymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, one observes a burst of hot atoms with an energy of about 150 nK. Several mean-ÿeld analyses of the collapse, which model the atom loss phenomenologically by a three-body recombination rate constant [34][35][36][37][38][39][40], as well as an approach that considers elastic condensate collisions [41,42], and an approach that takes into account the formation of molecules [43], have o ered a great deal of theoretical insight. Nevertheless, the physical mechanism responsible for the explosion of atoms out of the condensate and the formation of the noncondensed component is to a great extent still not understood at present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%