2004
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.200401939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics of Capillary Electrochromatography: Experimental Study of Flow and Transport in Particulate Beds

Abstract: The chromatographic performance with respect to the flow behavior and dispersion in fixed beds of nonporous and macroporous particles (having mean intraparticle pore diameters of 41, 105, and 232 nm) has been studied in capillary HPLC and electrochromatography. The existence of substantial electroosmotic intraparticle pore flow (perfusive electroosmosis) in columns packed with the macroporous particles was found to reduce stagnant mobile mass transfer resistance and decrease the global flow inhomogeneity over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 500 lm id glass-lined metal tubing was used as the slurry reservoir. SSI two-way and three-way valves (ERC, Riemerling, Germany) were placed between the pneumatic pump and slurry reservoir for pressure release and slurry injection, respectively [33]. An in-line MicroFilter with a PEEK polymer frit (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA) was connected to the capillary outlet before the packing process started.…”
Section: Preparation Of Packed Capillariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 500 lm id glass-lined metal tubing was used as the slurry reservoir. SSI two-way and three-way valves (ERC, Riemerling, Germany) were placed between the pneumatic pump and slurry reservoir for pressure release and slurry injection, respectively [33]. An in-line MicroFilter with a PEEK polymer frit (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA) was connected to the capillary outlet before the packing process started.…”
Section: Preparation Of Packed Capillariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, the dependence of m av in packed beds is a consequence of basically three contributions [109,110]: (i) normal or conventional EDL behavior at the particles' external surface, leading to a decrease of mobility with increasing ionic strength, (ii) generation of intraparticle volumetric EOF (increasing with increasing ionic strength), and (iii) the porosity of a particle. The last contribution results from the fact that conducting electrolyte in the particle introduces a normal component to the electrical field at its outer surface.…”
Section: Electroosmotic Perfusive Flow In Packed Beds Of Porous Partimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important parameter for analyzing intraparticleforced convection with EOF in packed beds of porous particles is the intraparticle EDL overlap represented by r intra /l D [20,42,[109][110][111], where r intra denotes the mean pore radius. The results of detailed experimental studies of the electroosmotic mobility (m av ) in packed beds of particles with different intraparticle porosities and pore sizes are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Electroosmotic Perfusive Flow In Packed Beds Of Porous Partimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the dynamic models referred to above, this approach is based upon the modeling of the trajectories of each individual molecule, requires extremely powerful computers in order to compute the motion of a statistically significant number of molecules and is not further considered in this review. Other theoretical work absent from this review includes (i) a stochastic model describing the consequences of wall adsorption in CE [84], (ii) the temperature-dependent interconversion models of dynamic electrophoresis [85][86][87][88], (iii) the simulation model for electroinjection analysis and electrophoretically mediated microanalysis [89], (iv) the affinity electrophoresis models of Andreev et al [90] and Fang and Chen [91][92][93][94], which describe affinity interactions in CE under simplified electromigration conditions, (v) the models of Cann and coworkers describing interacting systems in ZE [95], MBE [96] and IEF [97][98][99], (vi) the models predicting analyte separation in CEC [100][101][102][103][104], (vii) all multi-dimensional models that describe electrokinetically driven mass transport and separations in microfabricated chip devices, such as those of Ermakov et al [105], Bianchi et al [106], Chatterjee [107], Sounart and Baygents [108], Datta and Ghosal [109] and Hirokawa et al [110], (viii) the model of electrokinetic sample injection for capillary CZE with consideration of the electrode configuration [111], (ix) the models that predict sample zone formation, distortion and solute separation in continuous flow electrophoresis [112,113] and recycling electrophoresis [114][115][116], (x) the models describing off-gel electrophores...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%