2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.01.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamics and morphology of chiral magnetic bubbles in perpendicularly magnetized ultra-thin films

Abstract: We study bubble domain wall dynamics using micromagnetic simulations in perpendicularly magnetized ultra-thin films with disorder and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Disorder is incorporated into the material as grains with randomly distributed sizes and varying exchange constant at the edges. As expected, magnetic bubbles expand asymmetrically along the axis of the in-plane field under the simultaneous application of out-of-plane and in-plane fields. Remarkably, the shape of the bubble has a ripple-like pa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 for films with ID ≤ 12 × 10 18 He + /m 2 , suggesting that the dependence of σ on H x may not be the only modification to the creep law that needs to be considered to explain the influence of H x on bubble expansion in these samples. Some studies have proposed that other effects may be at play, such as a domain width dependence on H x [37,46], DW stiffness [47], or a dependence of the DW depinning field on H x [48]. Interestingly, the data presented in all these works share some features with our left and right velocity curves, such as asymmetry about the minimum velocity and matching velocities in the high field region.…”
Section: Field Driven Dw Dynamics In the Creep Regimesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 for films with ID ≤ 12 × 10 18 He + /m 2 , suggesting that the dependence of σ on H x may not be the only modification to the creep law that needs to be considered to explain the influence of H x on bubble expansion in these samples. Some studies have proposed that other effects may be at play, such as a domain width dependence on H x [37,46], DW stiffness [47], or a dependence of the DW depinning field on H x [48]. Interestingly, the data presented in all these works share some features with our left and right velocity curves, such as asymmetry about the minimum velocity and matching velocities in the high field region.…”
Section: Field Driven Dw Dynamics In the Creep Regimesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Matching velocities for up and down portions of the bubble indicate identical internal DW structures, which can only arise if the clockwise/anticlockwise ordering of the DW magnetisation around the bubble is broken. This occurs when vertical Bloch lines nucleate (overcoming the local dipolar energy barrier) and give rise to head-to-head or tail-totail configurations within the DW [22,37].…”
Section: Expansion Of Bubbles With Bloch and N éEl Domain Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also speculated that nucleation and annihilation of Bloch points may be responsible for a peculiar flattening of magnetic bubbles, which could in turn cause the observed velocity asymmetry. This again was confirmed through micromagnetic simulations by Sarma et al (2018). Pellegren et al (2017) argued that under an applied H x , where the DW energy density σ becomes anisotropic with respect to the DW orientation in the film plane, the correct elastic energy that should be considered to describe the creep regime does not simply identify with σ, as typically assumed in the phenomenological model of creep (Lemerle et al, 1998).…”
Section: A Creep Regimementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Several analytical and numerical study were devoted to understand these features. Kim et al (2016a) attributed the asymmetry in the DW energy density σ, to the asymmetric variation of DW width with H x , later confirmed by micromagnetic simulations (Sarma et al, 2018). Lau et al (2016) the described the velocity asymmetry in terms of the Wulff construction, which yields a methodology to determine the shape of a magnetic bubble, although it does not explicitly provide a model for the velocity as a function of in-plane field.…”
Section: A Creep Regimementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Several analytical and numerical studies were devoted to understanding these features. Kim, Kim, and Choe (2016) attributed the asymmetry in the DW energy density σ to the asymmetric variation of the DW width with H x , which was later confirmed by micromagnetic simulations (Sarma et al, 2018). Lau et al (2016) described the velocity asymmetry in terms of the Wulff construction, which yields a methodology determining the shape of a magnetic bubble, although it does not explicitly provide a model for the velocity as a function of the in-plane field.…”
Section: A Creep Regimementioning
confidence: 92%