One of the mechanisms that minimize the aberrant cross-talk between cAMP-and cGMP-dependent signaling pathways relies on the selectivity of cAMP binding domains (CBDs). For instance, the CBDs of two critical eukaryotic cAMP receptors, i.e. protein kinase A (PKA) and the exchange protein activated by cAMP (EPAC), are both selectively activated by cAMP. However, the mechanisms underlying their cAMP versus cGMP selectivity are quite distinct. In PKA this selectivity is controlled mainly at the level of ligand affinity, whereas in EPAC it is mostly determined at the level of allostery. Currently, the molecular basis for these different selectivity mechanisms is not fully understood. We have therefore comparatively analyzed by NMR the cGMP-bound states of the essential CBDs of PKA and EPAC, revealing key differences between them. Specifically, cGMP binds PKA preserving the same syn base orientation as cAMP at the price of local steric clashes, which lead to a reduced affinity for cGMP. Unlike PKA, cGMP is recognized by EPAC in an anti conformation and generates several short and long range perturbations. Although these effects do not alter significantly the structure of the EPAC CBD investigated, remarkable differences in dynamics between the cAMP-and cGMP-bound states are detected for the ionic latch region. These observations suggest that one of the determinants of cGMP antagonism in EPAC is the modulation of the entropic control of inhibitory interactions and illustrate the pivotal role of allostery in determining signaling selectivity as a function of dynamic changes, even in the absence of significant affinity variations.In eukaryotes, protein kinase A (PKA) 2 and the exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC) are two major receptors for the cAMP second messenger (1-4). The activities of both PKA and EPAC are modulated in a cAMP-dependent manner through cAMP binding domains (CBDs) (1-4). In all isoforms of PKA, two tandem CBDs, denoted as CBD-A and CBD-B, are part of the regulatory subunit (R), in which they are preceded by an N-terminal dimerization docking module and a linker region (Fig. 1a) (1, 3). In the inactive state PKA exists as a tetrameric holo-enzyme complex, including two regulatory (R) subunits and two catalytic (C) subunits (1, 3). Binding of cAMP to the CBDs of the R subunits results in the release of the C subunits and in the activation of the kinase function (1, 3).Unlike PKA, EPAC is a single-chain protein that functions as a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) for the small GTPase Rap1 and Rap2 (2, 4). The domain organization of EPAC includes an N-terminal regulatory region (RR) and a C-terminal catalytic region (CR) (Fig. 1b). There are two known homologous isoforms of EPAC, i.e. EPAC1 and EPAC2. One of the key differences between EPAC1 and EPAC2 is that in the former there is only a single CBD, whereas in the latter there are two noncontiguous CBDs, i.e. CBD-A and CBD-B. However, CBD-A has been shown not to be strictly necessary for the cAMP-dependent activation of EPAC (2, 4)....