Methanol‐to‐olefin (MTO) catalysis is a very active field of research because there is a wide variety of sometimes conflicting mechanistic proposals. An example is the ongoing discussion on the initial C−C bond formation from methanol during the induction period of the MTO process. By employing a combination of solid‐state NMR spectroscopy with UV/Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and mass spectrometry on an active H‐SAPO‐34 catalyst, we provide spectroscopic evidence for the formation of surface acetate and methyl acetate, as well as dimethoxymethane during the MTO process. As a consequence, new insights in the formation of the first C−C bond are provided, suggesting a direct mechanism may be operative, at least in the early stages of the MTO reaction.

No abstract

After a prolonged effort over many years, the route for the formation of a direct carbon-carbon (C-C) bond during the methanol-to-hydrocarbon (MTH) process has very recently been unveiled. However, the relevance of the "direct mechanism"-derived molecules (that is, methyl acetate) during MTH, and subsequent transformation routes to the conventional hydrocarbon pool (HCP) species, are yet to be established. This important piece of the MTH chemistry puzzle is not only essential from a fundamental perspective, but is also important to maximize catalytic performance. The MTH process was probed over a commercially relevant H-SAPO-34 catalyst, using a combination of advanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy and operando UV/Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy coupled to an on-line mass spectrometer. Spectroscopic evidence is provided for the formation of (olefinic and aromatic) HCP species, which are indeed derived exclusively from the direct C-C bond-containing acetyl group of methyl acetate. New mechanistic insights have been obtained from the MTH process, including the identification of hydrocarbon-based co-catalytic organic reaction centers.

CAMSAP and Patronin family members regulate microtubule minus-end stability and localization and thus organize non-centrosomal microtubule networks, which are essential for cell division, polarization and differentiation. Here, we show that the C-terminal CKK domain of CAMSAPs is widely present among eukaryotes and autonomously recognizes microtubule minus ends. Through a combination of structural approaches, we uncover how mammalian CKK binds between two tubulin dimers at the inter-protofilament interface on the outer microtubule surface. In vitro reconstitution assays combined with high resolution fluorescence microscopy and cryo-electron tomography suggest that CKK preferentially associates with the transition zone between curved protofilaments and the regular microtubule lattice. We propose that minus-end-specific features of the inter-protofilament interface at this site form the basis for CKK’s minus-end preference. The steric clash between microtubule-bound CKK and kinesin motors explains how CKK protects microtubule minus ends against kinesin-13-induced depolymerization and thus controls the stability of free microtubule minus ends.

A significant fraction of proteins coded in the human proteome do not fold into stable three-dimensional structures but are either partially or completely unfolded. A key feature of this family of proteins is their proposed capacity to undergo a disorder-to-order transition upon interaction with a physiological partner. The mechanisms governing protein folding upon interaction, in particular the extent to which recognition elements are preconfigured prior to formation of molecular complexes, can prove difficult to resolve in highly flexible systems. Here, we develop a conformational model of this type of protein, using an explicit description of the unfolded state, specifically modified to allow for the presence of transient secondary structure, and combining this with extensive measurement of residual dipolar couplings throughout the chain. This combination of techniques allows us to quantitatively analyze the level and nature of helical sampling present in the interaction site of the partially folded C-terminal domain of Sendai virus nucleoprotein (N(TAIL)). Rather than fraying randomly, the molecular recognition element of N(TAIL) preferentially populates three specific overlapping helical conformers, each stabilized by an N-capping interaction. The unfolded strands adjacent to the helix are thereby projected in the direction of the partner protein, identifying a mechanism by which they could achieve nonspecific encounter interactions prior to binding. This study provides experimental evidence for the molecular basis of helix formation in partially folded peptide chains, carrying clear implications for understanding early steps of protein folding.

The N-terminally truncated variant of photoactive yellow protein (Delta25-PYP) undergoes a very similar photocycle as the corresponding wild-type protein (WT-PYP), although the lifetime of its light-illuminated (pB) state is much longer. This has allowed determination of the structure of both its dark- (pG) as well as its pB-state in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The pG structure shows a well-defined fold, similar to WT-PYP and the X-ray structure of the pG state of Delta25-PYP. In the long-lived photocycle intermediate pB, the central beta sheet is still intact, as well as a small part of one alpha helix. The remainder of pB is unfolded and highly flexible, as evidenced by results from proton-deuterium exchange and NMR relaxation studies. Thus, the partially unfolded nature of the presumed signaling state of PYP in solution, as suggested previously, has now been structurally demonstrated.

1H detection can significantly improve solid‐state NMR spectral sensitivity and thereby allows studying more complex proteins. However, the common prerequisite for 1H detection is the introduction of exchangeable protons in otherwise deuterated proteins, which has thus far significantly hampered studies of partly water‐inaccessible proteins, such as membrane proteins. Herein, we present an approach that enables high‐resolution 1H‐detected solid‐state NMR (ssNMR) studies of water‐inaccessible proteins, and that even works in highly complex environments such as cellular surfaces. In particular, the method was applied to study the K+ channel KcsA in liposomes and in situ in native bacterial cell membranes. We used our data for a dynamic analysis, and we show that the selectivity filter, which is responsible for ion conduction and highly conserved in K+ channels, undergoes pronounced molecular motion. We expect this approach to open new avenues for biomolecular ssNMR.

Interaction of the C-terminal domains of Sendai virus (SeV) P and N proteins is crucial for RNA synthesis by correctly positioning the polymerase complex (L؉P) onto the nucleocapsid (N/RNA). To better understand this mechanism within the paramyxovirus family, we have studied the complex formed by the SeV C-terminal domains of P (PX) and N (N TAIL ) proteins by solution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We have characterized SeV N TAIL , which belongs to the class of intrinsically disordered proteins, and precisely defined the binding regions within this latter domain and within PX. SeV N TAIL binds with residues 472 to 493, which have a helical propensity (residues 477 to 491) to the surface created by helices ␣2 and ␣3 of PX with a 1:1 stoichiometry, as was also found for measles virus (MV). The binding interface is dominated by charged residues, and the dissociation constant was determined to be 57 ؎ 18 M under conditions of the experiment (i.e., in 0.5 M NaCl). We have also shown that the extreme C terminus of SeV N TAIL does not interact with PX, which is in contrast to MV, where a second binding site was identified. In addition, the interaction surfaces of the MV proteins are hydrophobic and a stronger binding constant was found. This gives a good illustration of how selection pressure allowed the C-terminal domains of N and P proteins to evolve concomitantly within this family of viruses in order to lead to protein complexes having the same three-dimensional fold, and thus the same function, but with completely different binding interfaces.