2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.207203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Pinning of a Domain Wall in a Magnetic Nanowire Induced by Walker Breakdown

Abstract: Transmission probability of a domain wall through a magnetic nanowire is investigated as a function of the external magnetic field. Very intriguing phenomenon is found that the transmission probability shows a significant drop after exceeding the threshold driving field, which contradicts our intuition that a domain wall is more mobile in the higher magnetic field. The micromagnetics simulation reveals that the domain wall motion in the wire with finite roughness causes the dynamical pinning due to the Walker … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the driving fi eld is between the Walker breakdown fi eld (15 Oe) and the static propagation fi eld (25 Oe), both the wall ' s velocity and its propagation distance are widely distributed, in good agreement with experiments. We note that the concept of dynamic DW pinning has previously been inferred by studying the transmission probability of vortex DWs between two positions in a nanowire 10 or by measuring the diff erent depinning fi elds of static and kinetic DWs at a notch 17 . Our experiments, in contrast, provide direct evidence that the DW is not necessarily pinned at the strongest pinning sites along the wire, as identifi ed in small or zero fi elds, but rather the phase of the DW ' s oscillatory precession along the nanowire has a key role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the driving fi eld is between the Walker breakdown fi eld (15 Oe) and the static propagation fi eld (25 Oe), both the wall ' s velocity and its propagation distance are widely distributed, in good agreement with experiments. We note that the concept of dynamic DW pinning has previously been inferred by studying the transmission probability of vortex DWs between two positions in a nanowire 10 or by measuring the diff erent depinning fi elds of static and kinetic DWs at a notch 17 . Our experiments, in contrast, provide direct evidence that the DW is not necessarily pinned at the strongest pinning sites along the wire, as identifi ed in small or zero fi elds, but rather the phase of the DW ' s oscillatory precession along the nanowire has a key role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of distinct static and kinetic depinning fields for viscous DW motion ͑below the Walker field͒ has been demonstrated in simulations 6 and investigated experimentally. 7 Kinetic depinning has also been observed indirectly as a "dynamical pinning" effect, 8,9 which occurs when the Walker field lies in between the static and kinetic pinning fields of a random potential due to edge roughness. In this paper we study the situation where the DW motion takes place above the Walker field and the DW interacts with a single, welldefined pinning site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical pinning effects have also been observed in experiments of field-driven vortex wall dynamics. 13,14 However, despite these advances, many details of the disorder effects on DW dynamics in nanostructures remain to be clarified.In this paper, we consider by micromagnetic simulations the effect of disorder on the field and current-driven dynamics of a transverse DW in a narrow and thin permalloy strip. Disorder is modeled by including randomly positioned small nonmagnetic regions (voids) in the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamical pinning effects have also been observed in experiments of field-driven vortex wall dynamics. 13,14 However, despite these advances, many details of the disorder effects on DW dynamics in nanostructures remain to be clarified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%