Dynamical coupled-channel model of kaon-hyperon interactions

Chiang, Wen-Tai; Saghai, B.; Tabakin, Frank; Lee, T.-S. H.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.69.065208

Cited by 46 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, Refs. [12,13] found that the resonance is less important in the K + Λ photoproduction, whereas Refs. [14,15] drew an opposite conclusion.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Coupling strength of theN*(1535)S11to theK+Λc

Mart

2013

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The N * (1535)S 11 coupling strength to the K + Λ channel, g N * (1535)ΛK + , is extracted from the latest and largest K + Λ photoproduction database by using an isobar model. It is found that the coupling is small. In term of the coupling ratio the best result is R ≡ |g N * (1535)ΛK + /g N * (1535)ηp | = 0.460 ± 0.172, much smaller than that obtained from the isobar analysis of the J/ψ decays, i.e., 1.3 ± 0.3, but consistent with the results of the unitary chiral approach of the same decay processes as well as the partial wave analysis of kaon photoproduction, i.e., R = 0.5 ∼ 0.7. The different results of R found here and in literature to date suggest that a more solid definition of the coupling constant, especially in the case of N * (1535)S 11 state, is urgently required, before a fair comparison can be made.

show abstract

“…For instance, Refs. [12,13] found that the resonance is less important in the K + Λ photoproduction, whereas Refs. [14,15] drew an opposite conclusion.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

“…[16]. Both models use the same resonance configuration as described above, but in the model A [B] the mass and width of the N * (2080)D 13 [N * (1900)P 13 ] resonance were considered as free parameters. As a result a total χ 2 of 9084 (9494) was obtained in model A (B).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Coupling strength of theN*(1535)S11to theK+Λc

Mart

2013

Phys. Rev. C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The quark models face difficulties in reproducing both these states [2,3,4]. In case of the N * (1710), some partial wave analyses [5,6] do not find any pole corresponding to it, while others claim a * kanchan@ific.uv.es † amartine@ific.uv.es ‡ oset@ific.uv.es 1 clear manifestation of this resonance [7,8,9,10]. On the other hand, the authors of [11] claim an indisputable existence of the N * (1710) from their study of the πN → ηN reaction in the coupled channel formalism and suggest that the status of this resonance should be improved from three-star to four-star.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The N*(1710) as a resonance in the ππN system

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We study the ππN system by solving the Faddeev equations, for which the input twobody t-matrices are obtained by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the coupled channel formalism. The potentials for the ππ, πN sub-systems and their coupled channels are obtained from chiral Lagrangians, which have been earlier used to study resonances in these systems successfully. In this work, we find a resonance in the ππN system with a mass of 1704−i375/2 MeV and with quantum numbers I = 1/2, J π = 1/2 + . We identify this state with the N * (1710). This peak is found where the energies of the ππ sub-system fall in the region of the σ resonance. We do not find evidence for the Roper resonance in our study indicating a more complex structure for this resonance, nor for any state with total isospin I = 3/2 or 5/2. IntroductionThe excited states of the nucleon have been studied extensively theoretically as well as experimentally. This is evident from the fact that many of these states, especially those in the energy region below 1750 MeV, have been assessed either three or four stars by the particle data group (PDG) [1]. Even then, there are some resonances in this low energy region which still need unanimous agreement on their characteristics or existence, e.g., the J π = 1/2 + resonances in the isospin 1/2 domain. The N * (1440) or Roper resonance is a subject of continuous debate and the existence of the N * (1710) is even questioned. The quark models face difficulties in reproducing both these states [2,3,4]. In case of the N * (1710), some partial wave analyses [5,6] do not find any pole corresponding to it, while others claim a * kanchan@ific.uv.es † amartine@ific.uv.es ‡ oset@ific.uv.es 1 clear manifestation of this resonance [7,8,9,10]. On the other hand, the authors of [11] claim an indisputable existence of the N * (1710) from their study of the πN → ηN reaction in the coupled channel formalism and suggest that the status of this resonance should be improved from three-star to four-star.Another controversy about the N * (1710) started after the finding of a narrow peak in the γA → (K + n)X reaction at LEPS [12], suggesting the existence of a pentaquark state which some groups associated to a SU(3) antidecuplet to which the N * (1710) would also belong (see, for example, [13,14]). In order to be compatible with the Θ + , the N * (1710) is required to be narrow. However, the width of this resonance is not known precisely, with the widths listed in [1] ranging from ∼ 90 -480 MeV. The authors of [15] re-analyzed the πN → KΛ reaction and found that a narrow width of the N * (1710) [1] was incompatible with the data and proposed the existence of another narrow resonance in this energy region. The partial wave analyses group who do not find a pole for the N * (1710) suggested to look for other resonance in this energy region as a possible narrow, non-strange partner of the θ + [16,17]. The debate on this issue has continued with new analyses which do not find a signal for the θ + , as a consequence of which, the ca...

show abstract

“…An alternative procedure to account for the real-loop corrections is offered by the approach of [19] which is based on the use of a Bethe-Salpeter equation. This approach was recently extended to kaon production in [20]. Another possible approach is the one discussed in [21] which is based on a different application of the K-matrix formalism.…”

Section: A K-matrix Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%