2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.757790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Characteristics of Recurrent Neuronal Networks Are Robust Against Low Synaptic Weight Resolution

Abstract: The representation of the natural-density, heterogeneous connectivity of neuronal network models at relevant spatial scales remains a challenge for Computational Neuroscience and Neuromorphic Computing. In particular, the memory demands imposed by the vast number of synapses in brain-scale network simulations constitute a major obstacle. Limiting the number resolution of synaptic weights appears to be a natural strategy to reduce memory and compute load. In this study, we investigate the effects of a limited s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Signals originating from outside of the local circuitry, i.e., from other cortical areas and the thalamus, can be approximated with Poisson-distributed spike input or DC current input. Tables 1-4 of [27] (see fixed total number models) contain a detailed model description and report the values of the parameters. The model explains the experimentally observed cell-type and layer-specific firing statistics, and it has been used in the past both as a building block for larger models (e.g., [28]) and as a benchmark for several validation studies [9,17,26,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Models Used For Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signals originating from outside of the local circuitry, i.e., from other cortical areas and the thalamus, can be approximated with Poisson-distributed spike input or DC current input. Tables 1-4 of [27] (see fixed total number models) contain a detailed model description and report the values of the parameters. The model explains the experimentally observed cell-type and layer-specific firing statistics, and it has been used in the past both as a building block for larger models (e.g., [28]) and as a benchmark for several validation studies [9,17,26,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Models Used For Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we show how to use the model workflow to calculate the firing rates of the cortical microcircuit model by Potjans and Diesmann ( 2014 ). The circuit is a simplified point neuron network model with biologically plausible parameters, which has been recently used in a number of other works: for example, to study network properties such as layer-dependent attentional processing (Wagatsuma et al, 2011 ), connectivity structure with respect to oscillations (Bos et al, 2016 ), and the effect of synaptic weight resolution on activity statistics (Dasbach, Tetzlaff, Diesmann, and Senk, 2021 ); to assess the performance of different simulator technologies such as neuromorphic hardware (van Albada et al, 2018 ) and GPUs (Knight and Nowotny, 2018 ; Golosio et al, 2021 ); to demonstrate forward-model prediction of local-field potentials from spiking activity (Hagen et al, 2016 ); and to serve as a building block for large-scale models (Schmidt et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: How To Use the Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, the theoretical predictions assume a connectivity with a fixed in-degree for each neuron. Dasbach et al ( 2021 ) show that simulated spike activity data of networks with these two different connectivity rules are characterized by differently shaped rate distributions (“reference” in their Figures 3d and 4d). In addition, the weights in the simulation are normally distributed while the theory replaces each distribution by its mean; this corresponds to the case N bins = 1 in Dasbach et al ( 2021 ).…”
Section: How To Use the Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One example is the required numerical precision, which determines the specification of data types and the implementation of arithmetic operations—a design decision that effects implementation complexity, chip area and power efficiency. So far, only a few studies have examined the effects of numerical accuracy on simulation outcomes (e.g., Pfeil et al, 2012 ; Trensch et al, 2018 ; Dasbach et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%